PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYQ7.DE vs. QDVG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYQ7.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF Acc (LYQ7.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYQ7.DE achieves a 2.82% return, which is significantly lower than QDVG.DE's 8.01% return. Over the past 10 years, LYQ7.DE has underperformed QDVG.DE with an annualized return of 1.43%, while QDVG.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.32% annualized return.


LYQ7.DE

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.38%
6M
1.82%
YTD
2.82%
1Y
2.92%
3Y*
1.87%
5Y*
0.47%
10Y*
1.43%

QDVG.DE

1D
0.53%
1M
8.42%
6M
5.91%
YTD
8.01%
1Y
25.38%
3Y*
7.87%
5Y*
6.85%
10Y*
9.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYQ7.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYQ7.DE
Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF Acc
2.82%0.95%-0.33%5.62%-9.46%6.28%2.86%6.51%-1.49%1.03%
QDVG.DE
iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
8.01%1.63%8.52%-1.74%3.27%37.79%1.62%24.91%8.84%7.33%

Correlation

The correlation between LYQ7.DE and QDVG.DE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYQ7.DE vs. QDVG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYQ7.DE
LYQ7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
LYQ7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYQ7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYQ7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
LYQ7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYQ7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVG.DE
QDVG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QDVG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYQ7.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF Acc (LYQ7.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LYQ7.DEQDVG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.28

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

2.46

-1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.25

6.17

-1.92

LYQ7.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYQ7.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the QDVG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYQ7.DE and QDVG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LYQ7.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYQ7.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.09%, smaller than the maximum QDVG.DE drawdown of -26.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYQ7.DE and QDVG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYQ7.DEQDVG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.09%

-26.79%

+10.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.04%

-10.26%

+8.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.31%

-22.68%

+17.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.09%

-22.68%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.09%

-26.79%

+10.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.88%

-1.38%

-4.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.71%

-6.32%

+2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

4.10%

-3.42%

Volatility

LYQ7.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF Acc (LYQ7.DE) is 0.73%, while iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) has a volatility of 5.28%. This indicates that LYQ7.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYQ7.DEQDVG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

5.28%

-4.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.82%

11.05%

-8.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.73%

15.31%

-11.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.68%

14.66%

-7.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.81%

16.70%

-10.89%

LYQ7.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYQ7.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVG.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LYQ7.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYQ7.DE nor QDVG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LYQ7.DE and QDVG.DE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYQ7.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYQ7.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QDVG.DE.

LYQ7.DE is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while QDVG.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. LYQ7.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index, while QDVG.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LYQ7.DE and 0.15% for QDVG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYQ7.DE and QDVG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer