LYQ7.DE vs. GOLD.AS
LYQ7.DE (Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF Acc) and GOLD.AS (Amundi Physical Gold ETC C) are both exchange-traded funds - LYQ7.DE is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index, while GOLD.AS is a Precious Metals fund tracking the LMBA Gold Price PM USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LYQ7.DE returned 0.72%/yr vs 19.72%/yr for GOLD.AS. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LYQ7.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for GOLD.AS.
Performance
LYQ7.DE vs. GOLD.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LYQ7.DE is traded in EUR, while GOLD.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GOLD.AS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYQ7.DE achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly lower than GOLD.AS's 4.79% return.
LYQ7.DE
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 3.12%
- 6M
- 2.80%
- 1Y
- 3.39%
- 3Y*
- 1.98%
- 5Y*
- 0.72%
- 10Y*
- 1.60%
GOLD.AS
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -3.67%
- YTD
- 4.79%
- 6M
- 6.32%
- 1Y
- 30.88%
- 3Y*
- 28.07%
- 5Y*
- 19.72%
- 10Y*
- —
LYQ7.DE vs. GOLD.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYQ7.DE Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF Acc | 3.12% | 0.95% | -0.33% | 5.62% | -9.46% | 6.28% | 2.86% | 5.46% |
GOLD.AS Amundi Physical Gold ETC C | 4.79% | 45.37% | 34.71% | 9.95% | 6.06% | 3.08% | 14.06% | 18.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYQ7.DE and GOLD.AS is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2019 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYQ7.DE vs. GOLD.AS — Risk / Return Rank
LYQ7.DE
GOLD.AS
LYQ7.DE vs. GOLD.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF Acc (LYQ7.DE) and Amundi Physical Gold ETC C (GOLD.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYQ7.DE | GOLD.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.25 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 1.72 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.16 | 4.51 | -0.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYQ7.DE | GOLD.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 1.23 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 1.17 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 1.12 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
LYQ7.DE vs. GOLD.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYQ7.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.09%, smaller than the maximum GOLD.AS drawdown of -18.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYQ7.DE and GOLD.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYQ7.DE | GOLD.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.09% | -18.25% | +2.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.04% | -17.29% | +15.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.53% | -17.29% | +11.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.09% | -17.29% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.60% | -15.09% | +9.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -5.64% | +1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 6.63% | -5.86% |
Volatility
LYQ7.DE vs. GOLD.AS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF Acc (LYQ7.DE) is 1.19%, while Amundi Physical Gold ETC C (GOLD.AS) has a volatility of 5.72%. This indicates that LYQ7.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOLD.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYQ7.DE | GOLD.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.19% | 5.72% | -4.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.97% | 21.43% | -18.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.77% | 24.26% | -20.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.69% | 16.62% | -9.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.82% | 16.32% | -10.50% |
LYQ7.DE vs. GOLD.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYQ7.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GOLD.AS's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LYQ7.DE vs. GOLD.AS - Dividend Comparison
Neither LYQ7.DE nor GOLD.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LYQ7.DE and GOLD.AS have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYQ7.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYQ7.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for GOLD.AS.
LYQ7.DE is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while GOLD.AS is Precious Metals. LYQ7.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index, while GOLD.AS tracks LMBA Gold Price PM USD. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LYQ7.DE and 0.12% for GOLD.AS.
Find the right allocation for LYQ7.DE and GOLD.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer