PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYQ3.DE vs. CYBU.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYQ3.DE vs. CYBU.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Euro Government Bond 3-5Y UCITS ETF Acc (LYQ3.DE) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Dist) (CYBU.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LYQ3.DE is traded in EUR, while CYBU.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CYBU.AS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYQ3.DE achieves a -0.32% return, which is significantly lower than CYBU.AS's 3.70% return.


LYQ3.DE

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
-0.32%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
0.63%
3Y*
2.71%
5Y*
-0.36%
10Y*
-0.05%

CYBU.AS

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.77%
YTD
3.70%
6M
2.99%
1Y
2.31%
3Y*
4.13%
5Y*
6.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYQ3.DE vs. CYBU.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LYQ3.DE
Amundi Euro Government Bond 3-5Y UCITS ETF Acc
-0.32%2.66%2.16%5.09%-10.00%-1.33%1.07%-0.56%
CYBU.AS
iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Dist)
3.70%-9.69%18.86%4.58%8.91%9.95%-7.28%0.97%

Correlation

The correlation between LYQ3.DE and CYBU.AS is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2019

-0.04

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between LYQ3.DE and CYBU.AS has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.04 to -0.30, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYQ3.DE vs. CYBU.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYQ3.DE
LYQ3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
LYQ3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYQ3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYQ3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
LYQ3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYQ3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

CYBU.AS
CYBU.AS Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CYBU.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CYBU.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CYBU.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CYBU.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CYBU.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYQ3.DE vs. CYBU.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Euro Government Bond 3-5Y UCITS ETF Acc (LYQ3.DE) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Dist) (CYBU.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYQ3.DECYBU.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.05

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

0.44

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.43

1.00

-0.56

LYQ3.DE vs. CYBU.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYQ3.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the CYBU.AS Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYQ3.DE and CYBU.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYQ3.DECYBU.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

0.29

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

0.83

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.52

+0.15

Drawdowns

LYQ3.DE vs. CYBU.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYQ3.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.43%, smaller than the maximum CYBU.AS drawdown of -15.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYQ3.DE and CYBU.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYQ3.DECYBU.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.43%

-15.50%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.38%

-4.26%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.38%

-12.74%

+10.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.02%

-12.74%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-7.68%

+4.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.20%

-6.50%

+4.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

1.87%

-1.02%

Volatility

LYQ3.DE vs. CYBU.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Euro Government Bond 3-5Y UCITS ETF Acc (LYQ3.DE) is 0.99%, while iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Dist) (CYBU.AS) has a volatility of 1.41%. This indicates that LYQ3.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CYBU.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYQ3.DECYBU.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

1.41%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.23%

4.60%

-2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51%

6.58%

-4.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.56%

7.87%

-4.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.80%

7.79%

-4.99%

LYQ3.DE vs. CYBU.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYQ3.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than CYBU.AS's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYQ3.DE vs. CYBU.AS - Dividend Comparison

LYQ3.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CYBU.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CYBU.AS
iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Dist)
1.84%1.88%2.13%2.45%2.60%2.82%2.66%0.21%
LYQ3.DE
Amundi Euro Government Bond 3-5Y UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYQ3.DE and CYBU.AS have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYQ3.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYQ3.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CYBU.AS.

LYQ3.DE is categorized as European Government Bonds, while CYBU.AS is Emerging Markets Bonds. LYQ3.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Treasury 50bn 3-5 Year Bond, while CYBU.AS tracks Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for LYQ3.DE and 0.40% for CYBU.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYQ3.DE and CYBU.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer