PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYQ2.DE vs. XDW0.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYQ2.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Euro Government Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Acc (LYQ2.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYQ2.DE achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly lower than XDW0.DE's 32.75% return. Over the past 10 years, LYQ2.DE has underperformed XDW0.DE with an annualized return of 0.10%, while XDW0.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.20% annualized return.


LYQ2.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.02%
6M
0.14%
1Y
0.85%
3Y*
2.54%
5Y*
0.55%
10Y*
0.10%

XDW0.DE

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.29%
YTD
32.75%
6M
28.86%
1Y
45.88%
3Y*
15.71%
5Y*
20.33%
10Y*
9.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYQ2.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYQ2.DE
Amundi Euro Government Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Acc
0.02%2.14%2.96%3.27%-4.97%-0.84%-0.20%-0.12%-0.45%-0.63%
XDW0.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C
32.75%2.24%7.48%0.18%53.95%52.18%-36.97%14.05%-12.13%-7.68%

Correlation

The correlation between LYQ2.DE and XDW0.DE is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016

-0.09

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between LYQ2.DE and XDW0.DE has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.09 to -0.33, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYQ2.DE vs. XDW0.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYQ2.DE
LYQ2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
LYQ2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYQ2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYQ2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
LYQ2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYQ2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

XDW0.DE
XDW0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XDW0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYQ2.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Euro Government Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Acc (LYQ2.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYQ2.DEXDW0.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.37

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

2.98

-2.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.82

9.92

-8.10

LYQ2.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYQ2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the XDW0.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYQ2.DE and XDW0.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYQ2.DEXDW0.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

2.10

-1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.84

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

0.35

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.37

+0.51

Drawdowns

LYQ2.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYQ2.DE drawdown since its inception was -7.75%, smaller than the maximum XDW0.DE drawdown of -61.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYQ2.DE and XDW0.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYQ2.DEXDW0.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.75%

-61.44%

+53.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.22%

-15.05%

+13.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.22%

-23.71%

+22.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.02%

-23.71%

+17.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.75%

-61.44%

+53.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-7.38%

+6.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.30%

-13.84%

+12.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

4.53%

-4.14%

Volatility

LYQ2.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Euro Government Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Acc (LYQ2.DE) is 0.55%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that LYQ2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDW0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYQ2.DEXDW0.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.55%

6.96%

-6.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.14%

18.42%

-17.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26%

21.48%

-20.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.65%

24.04%

-22.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.31%

26.02%

-24.71%

LYQ2.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYQ2.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than XDW0.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LYQ2.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYQ2.DE nor XDW0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LYQ2.DE and XDW0.DE have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYQ2.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYQ2.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDW0.DE.

LYQ2.DE is categorized as European Government Bonds, while XDW0.DE is Energy Equities. LYQ2.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Treasury 50bn 1-3 Year Bond, while XDW0.DE tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for LYQ2.DE and 0.25% for XDW0.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYQ2.DE and XDW0.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer