LYPU.DE vs. LSMC.DE
LYPU.DE (Amundi Australia S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF Dist) and LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LYPU.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the S&P/ASX 200, while LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LYPU.DE returned 7.90%/yr vs 28.49%/yr for LSMC.DE. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LYPU.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LSMC.DE.
Performance
LYPU.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYPU.DE achieves a 8.54% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 63.83% return. Over the past 10 years, LYPU.DE has underperformed LSMC.DE with an annualized return of 7.90%, while LSMC.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 28.49% annualized return.
LYPU.DE
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- 8.54%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- 12.51%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.35%
- 10Y*
- 7.90%
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- 12.86%
- YTD
- 63.83%
- 6M
- 63.41%
- 1Y
- 126.99%
- 3Y*
- 62.06%
- 5Y*
- 36.20%
- 10Y*
- 28.49%
LYPU.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYPU.DE Amundi Australia S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF Dist | 8.54% | 4.70% | 8.32% | 8.44% | -3.43% | 19.30% | 0.44% | 25.66% | -8.48% | 5.77% |
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 63.83% | 32.60% | 66.54% | 74.46% | -34.66% | 37.56% | 23.03% | 39.73% | -5.73% | 12.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYPU.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2010 | 0.46 |
The correlation between LYPU.DE and LSMC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYPU.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LYPU.DE
LSMC.DE
LYPU.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Australia S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF Dist (LYPU.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYPU.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.59 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 10.37 | -8.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 32.83 | -28.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYPU.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 4.27 | -3.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 1.15 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 1.09 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.82 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
LYPU.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYPU.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.59%, which is greater than LSMC.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYPU.DE and LSMC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYPU.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.59% | -39.77% | -3.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.50% | -12.53% | +4.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.92% | -36.22% | +13.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.92% | -39.77% | +16.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.59% | -39.77% | -3.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.82% | -3.34% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -9.37% | +2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 3.96% | -1.10% |
Volatility
LYPU.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Australia S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF Dist (LYPU.DE) is 3.96%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 11.23%. This indicates that LYPU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYPU.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 11.23% | -7.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.97% | 22.18% | -11.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.87% | 30.40% | -16.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 31.21% | -13.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 26.06% | -5.34% |
LYPU.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYPU.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
LYPU.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison
LYPU.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, while LSMC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LYPU.DE Amundi Australia S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF Dist | 2.79% | 3.03% | 4.05% | 3.47% | 4.79% | 3.20% | 2.38% | 3.86% | 4.50% | 3.93% | 3.92% | 4.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LYPU.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYPU.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYPU.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
LYPU.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. LYPU.DE tracks S&P/ASX 200, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LYPU.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
Find the right allocation for LYPU.DE and LSMC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer