PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYPE.DE vs. XUTC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYPE.DE vs. XUTC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPE.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XUTC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYPE.DE achieves a -2.00% return, which is significantly lower than XUTC.DE's 24.28% return.


LYPE.DE

1D
2.79%
1M
3.48%
YTD
-2.00%
6M
-1.61%
1Y
9.70%
3Y*
2.46%
5Y*
5.27%
10Y*
7.45%

XUTC.DE

1D
-2.26%
1M
12.31%
YTD
24.28%
6M
22.53%
1Y
48.23%
3Y*
30.49%
5Y*
24.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYPE.DE vs. XUTC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYPE.DE
Amundi MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF EUR Acc
-2.00%2.17%7.03%-0.27%-0.17%30.38%2.44%27.39%5.67%0.74%
XUTC.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
24.28%9.83%44.60%52.37%-27.42%44.01%32.64%53.18%3.08%10.00%

Correlation

The correlation between LYPE.DE and XUTC.DE is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2017

0.51

Over the past year, the correlation between LYPE.DE and XUTC.DE has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYPE.DE vs. XUTC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYPE.DE
LYPE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
LYPE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYPE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYPE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
LYPE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYPE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

XUTC.DE
XUTC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XUTC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUTC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUTC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XUTC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUTC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYPE.DE vs. XUTC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPE.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XUTC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYPE.DEXUTC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.38

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

3.03

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.27

7.84

-5.57

LYPE.DE vs. XUTC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYPE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the XUTC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYPE.DE and XUTC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYPE.DEXUTC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

2.37

-1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

1.03

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

1.10

-0.34

Drawdowns

LYPE.DE vs. XUTC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYPE.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.95%, smaller than the maximum XUTC.DE drawdown of -31.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYPE.DE and XUTC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYPE.DEXUTC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.95%

-31.79%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.21%

-16.16%

+5.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.30%

-30.48%

+9.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.30%

-30.48%

+9.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.75%

-3.00%

-5.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.06%

-6.37%

+1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

6.26%

-2.08%

Volatility

LYPE.DE vs. XUTC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPE.DE) is 4.96%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XUTC.DE) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that LYPE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XUTC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYPE.DEXUTC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

7.31%

-2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.76%

15.12%

-5.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.82%

20.70%

-6.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.41%

23.01%

-9.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.64%

22.97%

-8.33%

LYPE.DE vs. XUTC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYPE.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XUTC.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYPE.DE vs. XUTC.DE - Dividend Comparison

LYPE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUTC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
LYPE.DE
Amundi MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF EUR Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUTC.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
0.26%0.34%0.36%0.53%1.14%0.51%0.64%0.59%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYPE.DE and XUTC.DE have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUTC.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUTC.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LYPE.DE.

LYPE.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XUTC.DE is Technology Equities. LYPE.DE tracks MSCI World Health Care, while XUTC.DE tracks MSCI USA Information Technology 20/35 Custom. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LYPE.DE and 0.12% for XUTC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYPE.DE and XUTC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer