LYPD.DE vs. XUFN.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LYPD.DE (Amundi MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and XUFN.DE (Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D) are both Financials Equities funds - LYPD.DE tracks the MSCI World Financials while XUFN.DE tracks the MSCI USA Financials. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LYPD.DE returned 12.81%/yr vs 9.47%/yr for XUFN.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LYPD.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XUFN.DE.

Performance

LYPD.DE vs. XUFN.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPD.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XUFN.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYPD.DE achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly higher than XUFN.DE's -4.69% return.

LYPD.DE

• 1D: 1.87%
• 1M: 1.06%
• YTD: 0.92%
• 6M: 4.40%
• 1Y: 12.40%
• 3Y*: 20.69%
• 5Y*: 12.81%
• 10Y*: 11.83%

XUFN.DE

• 1D: 3.20%
• 1M: 1.29%
• YTD: -4.69%
• 6M: -2.50%
• 1Y: 2.59%
• 3Y*: 16.27%
• 5Y*: 9.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYPD.DE vs. XUFN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LYPD.DE Amundi MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF EUR Acc	0.92%	15.56%	33.60%	12.32%	-5.01%	39.46%	-11.53%	29.12%	-13.88%	9.05%
XUFN.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D	-4.69%	3.41%	38.69%	10.96%	-7.89%	49.37%	-12.55%	36.23%	-11.22%	14.21%

Correlation

The correlation between LYPD.DE and XUFN.DE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2017	0.93

The correlation between LYPD.DE and XUFN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LYPD.DE vs. XUFN.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYPD.DE

LYPD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 26
LYPD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
LYPD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
LYPD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 24
LYPD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
LYPD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 28

XUFN.DE

XUFN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
XUFN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
XUFN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
XUFN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 11
XUFN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
XUFN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYPD.DE vs. XUFN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPD.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XUFN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LYPD.DE	XUFN.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	0.13	+0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	0.28	+1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.03	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	0.14	+1.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.81	0.33	+3.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LYPD.DE vs. XUFN.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYPD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the XUFN.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYPD.DE and XUFN.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LYPD.DE	XUFN.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87	0.13	+0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	0.50	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.52	+0.06

Drawdowns

LYPD.DE vs. XUFN.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYPD.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.19%, roughly equal to the maximum XUFN.DE drawdown of -43.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYPD.DE and XUFN.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	LYPD.DE	XUFN.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.19%	-43.39%	+1.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.63%	-13.24%	+3.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.02%	-23.03%	+3.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.02%	-23.03%	+3.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	-9.49%	+8.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.01%	-7.81%	+0.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.20%	5.77%	-2.57%

Volatility

LYPD.DE vs. XUFN.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPD.DE) is 3.44%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XUFN.DE) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that LYPD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XUFN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LYPD.DE	XUFN.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.44%	4.40%	-0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.35%	10.85%	-0.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.94%	15.00%	-1.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.53%	18.60%	-2.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.69%	21.59%	-2.90%

LYPD.DE vs. XUFN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYPD.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XUFN.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

LYPD.DE vs. XUFN.DE - Dividend Comparison

LYPD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUFN.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LYPD.DE Amundi MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF EUR Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XUFN.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D	1.15%	1.17%	1.08%	1.66%	2.69%	1.25%	1.34%	3.46%	0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LYPD.DE and XUFN.DE in my portfolio?

LYPD.DE and XUFN.DE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LYPD.DE or XUFN.DE?

On fees, XUFN.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LYPD.DE or XUFN.DE?

XUFN.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LYPD.DE.

What is the main difference between LYPD.DE and XUFN.DE?

LYPD.DE tracks MSCI World Financials, while XUFN.DE tracks MSCI USA Financials. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LYPD.DE and 0.12% for XUFN.DE.