PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYPD.DE vs. EXH5.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYPD.DE vs. EXH5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPD.DE) and iShares STOXX Europe 600 Insurance UCITS ETF (DE) (EXH5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYPD.DE achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly higher than EXH5.DE's -2.53% return. Over the past 10 years, LYPD.DE has outperformed EXH5.DE with an annualized return of 11.83%, while EXH5.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.04% annualized return.


LYPD.DE

1D
1.87%
1M
1.06%
YTD
0.92%
6M
4.40%
1Y
12.40%
3Y*
20.69%
5Y*
12.81%
10Y*
11.83%

EXH5.DE

1D
0.28%
1M
-3.87%
YTD
-2.53%
6M
3.06%
1Y
2.56%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
13.96%
10Y*
11.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYPD.DE vs. EXH5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYPD.DE
Amundi MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF EUR Acc
0.92%15.56%33.60%12.32%-5.01%39.46%-11.53%29.12%-13.88%8.07%
EXH5.DE
iShares STOXX Europe 600 Insurance UCITS ETF (DE)
-2.53%29.72%22.68%12.56%3.63%19.44%-10.66%30.48%-7.15%11.47%

Correlation

The correlation between LYPD.DE and EXH5.DE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2010

0.73

The correlation between LYPD.DE and EXH5.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (3 years) to 0.75 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYPD.DE vs. EXH5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYPD.DE
LYPD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
LYPD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYPD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYPD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
LYPD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYPD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

EXH5.DE
EXH5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
EXH5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXH5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXH5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
EXH5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXH5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYPD.DE vs. EXH5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPD.DE) and iShares STOXX Europe 600 Insurance UCITS ETF (DE) (EXH5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYPD.DEEXH5.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.04

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

0.38

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.81

0.78

+3.02

LYPD.DE vs. EXH5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYPD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the EXH5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYPD.DE and EXH5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYPD.DEEXH5.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

0.19

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.83

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.55

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.31

+0.27

Drawdowns

LYPD.DE vs. EXH5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYPD.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.19%, smaller than the maximum EXH5.DE drawdown of -73.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYPD.DE and EXH5.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYPD.DEEXH5.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.19%

-73.44%

+31.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

-7.40%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.02%

-12.31%

-7.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.02%

-18.63%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.19%

-46.55%

+4.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-5.47%

+4.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.01%

-15.47%

+8.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

3.57%

-0.37%

Volatility

LYPD.DE vs. EXH5.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPD.DE) is 3.44%, while iShares STOXX Europe 600 Insurance UCITS ETF (DE) (EXH5.DE) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that LYPD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXH5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYPD.DEEXH5.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

4.83%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.35%

11.66%

-1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.94%

15.13%

-1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.53%

16.59%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.69%

19.93%

-1.24%

LYPD.DE vs. EXH5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYPD.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EXH5.DE's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYPD.DE vs. EXH5.DE - Dividend Comparison

LYPD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EXH5.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXH5.DE
iShares STOXX Europe 600 Insurance UCITS ETF (DE)
3.48%3.39%3.59%3.79%4.51%3.56%2.52%3.84%4.03%4.87%4.34%3.67%
LYPD.DE
Amundi MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF EUR Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYPD.DE and EXH5.DE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYPD.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYPD.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for EXH5.DE.

LYPD.DE tracks MSCI World Financials, while EXH5.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Insurance. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LYPD.DE and 0.46% for EXH5.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYPD.DE and EXH5.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer