LYP2.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE

Last updated Jul 4, 2026

LYP2.DE (Amundi Core S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)) and 4UBQ.DE (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both S&P 500 funds - LYP2.DE tracks the S&P 500 Index (EUR Hedged) while 4UBQ.DE tracks the S&P 500 ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LYP2.DE returned 10.48%/yr vs 14.39%/yr for 4UBQ.DE. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LYP2.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for 4UBQ.DE.

Performance

LYP2.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Core S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (LYP2.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYP2.DE achieves a 7.84% return, which is significantly lower than 4UBQ.DE's 12.19% return.

LYP2.DE

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -0.97%
• 6M: 8.72%
• YTD: 7.84%
• 1Y: 17.76%
• 3Y*: 17.85%
• 5Y*: 10.48%
• 10Y*: 12.62%

4UBQ.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.52%
• 6M: 12.78%
• YTD: 12.19%
• 1Y: 26.75%
• 3Y*: 18.17%
• 5Y*: 14.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYP2.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
LYP2.DE Amundi Core S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)	7.84%	15.46%	22.97%	23.48%	-21.40%	28.77%	18.20%
4UBQ.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc	12.19%	5.39%	31.02%	24.03%	-13.92%	43.62%	7.99%

Correlation

The correlation between LYP2.DE and 4UBQ.DE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2020	0.81

The correlation between LYP2.DE and 4UBQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LYP2.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYP2.DE

LYP2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 52
LYP2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
LYP2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
LYP2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 49
LYP2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
LYP2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 57

4UBQ.DE

4UBQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 86
4UBQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
4UBQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
4UBQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 85
4UBQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
4UBQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYP2.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Core S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (LYP2.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LYP2.DE	4UBQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	2.26	-0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	3.15	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.42	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	3.88	-1.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.21	14.86	-6.65

LYP2.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYP2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the 4UBQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYP2.DE and 4UBQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LYP2.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYP2.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, which is greater than 4UBQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYP2.DE and 4UBQ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	LYP2.DE	4UBQ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.94%	-23.35%	-10.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.67%	-6.93%	-1.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.39%	-23.35%	+4.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.88%	-23.35%	-2.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.53%	-0.90%	-0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.51%	-3.95%	-0.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	1.81%	+0.35%

Volatility

LYP2.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Core S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (LYP2.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE) at 3.49%. This indicates that LYP2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4UBQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LYP2.DE	4UBQ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	3.49%	+0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.28%	8.11%	+1.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.13%	11.93%	+0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.05%	15.33%	+0.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.16%	15.46%	+0.70%

LYP2.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYP2.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than 4UBQ.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LYP2.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

LYP2.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, while 4UBQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
4UBQ.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LYP2.DE Amundi Core S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)	0.92%	0.99%	1.27%	1.04%	2.05%	1.11%	1.43%	1.67%	1.99%	1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LYP2.DE and 4UBQ.DE in my portfolio?

LYP2.DE and 4UBQ.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LYP2.DE or 4UBQ.DE?

On fees, LYP2.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LYP2.DE or 4UBQ.DE?

LYP2.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for 4UBQ.DE.

What is the main difference between LYP2.DE and 4UBQ.DE?

LYP2.DE tracks S&P 500 Index (EUR Hedged), while 4UBQ.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for LYP2.DE and 0.10% for 4UBQ.DE.