LYMS.DE vs. NQSE.DE
LYMS.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc) and NQSE.DE (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - LYMS.DE tracks the Nasdaq 100® while NQSE.DE tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LYMS.DE returned 18.88%/yr vs 14.91%/yr for NQSE.DE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LYMS.DE charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for NQSE.DE.
Performance
LYMS.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYMS.DE achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly higher than NQSE.DE's 17.82% return.
LYMS.DE
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 20.63%
- 6M
- 18.72%
- 1Y
- 37.20%
- 3Y*
- 24.71%
- 5Y*
- 18.88%
- 10Y*
- 21.41%
NQSE.DE
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 6.66%
- YTD
- 17.82%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 35.67%
- 3Y*
- 25.27%
- 5Y*
- 14.91%
- 10Y*
- —
LYMS.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc | 20.63% | 7.15% | 33.72% | 51.52% | -29.87% | 39.59% | 34.60% | 42.84% | -13.76% |
NQSE.DE iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 17.82% | 18.16% | 24.07% | 52.10% | -36.29% | 27.37% | 45.23% | 35.67% | -15.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYMS.DE and NQSE.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2018 | 0.90 |
The correlation between LYMS.DE and NQSE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYMS.DE vs. NQSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LYMS.DE
NQSE.DE
LYMS.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYMS.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.39 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 3.08 | +0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.23 | 10.77 | +0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYMS.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 2.28 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.71 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.82 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
LYMS.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYMS.DE drawdown since its inception was -50.00%, which is greater than NQSE.DE's maximum drawdown of -37.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYMS.DE and NQSE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYMS.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.00% | -37.67% | -12.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.02% | -11.87% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.74% | -22.40% | -4.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.12% | -37.67% | +6.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -0.84% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.78% | -8.56% | -0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 3.40% | -0.03% |
Volatility
LYMS.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) is 4.37%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that LYMS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NQSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYMS.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 4.75% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.99% | 11.99% | -1.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.73% | 16.05% | -0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.91% | 20.91% | -1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.68% | 21.54% | -1.86% |
LYMS.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYMS.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than NQSE.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
LYMS.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LYMS.DE nor NQSE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.65% | 0.69% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 1.18% |
NQSE.DE iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, LYMS.DE and NQSE.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LYMS.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYMS.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for NQSE.DE.
LYMS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while NQSE.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for LYMS.DE and 0.33% for NQSE.DE.
Find the right allocation for LYMS.DE and NQSE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer