PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYMS.DE vs. LBRA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYMS.DE vs. LBRA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) and Amundi MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF Acc (LBRA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYMS.DE achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly higher than LBRA.DE's 10.59% return. Over the past 10 years, LYMS.DE has outperformed LBRA.DE with an annualized return of 21.41%, while LBRA.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.63% annualized return.


LYMS.DE

1D
-0.86%
1M
7.96%
YTD
20.63%
6M
18.72%
1Y
37.20%
3Y*
24.71%
5Y*
18.88%
10Y*
21.41%

LBRA.DE

1D
-0.48%
1M
-11.78%
YTD
10.59%
6M
7.54%
1Y
30.59%
3Y*
8.24%
5Y*
5.61%
10Y*
7.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYMS.DE vs. LBRA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYMS.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc
20.63%7.15%33.72%51.52%-29.87%39.59%34.60%42.84%3.18%15.91%
LBRA.DE
Amundi MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF Acc
10.59%32.01%-26.48%29.27%22.98%-14.68%-26.84%30.74%0.23%8.95%

Correlation

The correlation between LYMS.DE and LBRA.DE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2007

0.41

The correlation between LYMS.DE and LBRA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (3 years) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYMS.DE vs. LBRA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYMS.DE
LYMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
LYMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

LBRA.DE
LBRA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LBRA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBRA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBRA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
LBRA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBRA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYMS.DE vs. LBRA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) and Amundi MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF Acc (LBRA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYMS.DELBRA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.25

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

1.98

+1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.23

6.54

+4.69

LYMS.DE vs. LBRA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYMS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the LBRA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYMS.DE and LBRA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYMS.DELBRA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

1.42

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.21

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.08

0.24

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.06

+0.71

Drawdowns

LYMS.DE vs. LBRA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYMS.DE drawdown since its inception was -50.00%, smaller than the maximum LBRA.DE drawdown of -76.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYMS.DE and LBRA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYMS.DELBRA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.00%

-76.26%

+26.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.02%

-15.63%

+5.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.74%

-28.86%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.12%

-29.47%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.12%

-55.22%

+24.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-24.57%

+23.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.78%

-38.24%

+29.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

4.75%

-1.38%

Volatility

LYMS.DE vs. LBRA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) is 4.37%, while Amundi MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF Acc (LBRA.DE) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that LYMS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LBRA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYMS.DELBRA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

6.39%

-2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.99%

18.10%

-7.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.73%

21.90%

-6.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.91%

26.20%

-6.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.68%

31.81%

-12.13%

LYMS.DE vs. LBRA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYMS.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than LBRA.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYMS.DE vs. LBRA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYMS.DE nor LBRA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LBRA.DE
Amundi MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LYMS.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.65%0.69%0.76%1.09%1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYMS.DE and LBRA.DE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYMS.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYMS.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LBRA.DE.

LYMS.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while LBRA.DE is Latin America Equities. LYMS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while LBRA.DE tracks MSCI Brazil. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for LYMS.DE and 0.65% for LBRA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYMS.DE and LBRA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer