LYMS.DE vs. KLMT.DE
LYMS.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc) and KLMT.DE (Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - LYMS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®, while KLMT.DE is a Global Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Solactive Green Bond. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LYMS.DE returned 18.88%/yr vs -1.72%/yr for KLMT.DE. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LYMS.DE charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for KLMT.DE.
Performance
LYMS.DE vs. KLMT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYMS.DE achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly higher than KLMT.DE's 0.36% return.
LYMS.DE
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 20.63%
- 6M
- 18.72%
- 1Y
- 37.20%
- 3Y*
- 24.71%
- 5Y*
- 18.88%
- 10Y*
- 21.41%
KLMT.DE
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- 1Y
- 1.04%
- 3Y*
- 2.73%
- 5Y*
- -1.72%
- 10Y*
- —
LYMS.DE vs. KLMT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc | 20.63% | 7.15% | 33.72% | 51.52% | -29.87% | 39.59% | 24.88% |
KLMT.DE Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc | 0.36% | -0.22% | 3.21% | 6.84% | -18.17% | -1.90% | 0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYMS.DE and KLMT.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2020 | 0.13 |
The correlation between LYMS.DE and KLMT.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYMS.DE vs. KLMT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LYMS.DE
KLMT.DE
LYMS.DE vs. KLMT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) and Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc (KLMT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYMS.DE | KLMT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.03 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 0.21 | +3.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.23 | 0.56 | +10.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYMS.DE | KLMT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 0.17 | +2.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | -0.29 | +1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | -0.26 | +1.03 |
Drawdowns
LYMS.DE vs. KLMT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYMS.DE drawdown since its inception was -50.00%, which is greater than KLMT.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYMS.DE and KLMT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYMS.DE | KLMT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.00% | -21.03% | -28.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.02% | -3.19% | -6.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.74% | -3.58% | -23.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.12% | -20.36% | -10.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -12.12% | +11.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.78% | -10.86% | +2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 1.17% | +2.20% |
Volatility
LYMS.DE vs. KLMT.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc (KLMT.DE) at 1.45%. This indicates that LYMS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KLMT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYMS.DE | KLMT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 1.45% | +2.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.99% | 3.19% | +7.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.73% | 3.89% | +11.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.91% | 5.81% | +14.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.68% | 6.73% | +12.95% |
LYMS.DE vs. KLMT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYMS.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than KLMT.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LYMS.DE vs. KLMT.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LYMS.DE nor KLMT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KLMT.DE Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.65% | 0.69% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LYMS.DE and KLMT.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYMS.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYMS.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for KLMT.DE.
LYMS.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while KLMT.DE is Global Corporate Bonds. LYMS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while KLMT.DE tracks Solactive Green Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for LYMS.DE and 0.25% for KLMT.DE.
Find the right allocation for LYMS.DE and KLMT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer