LYMS.DE vs. EQQX.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LYMS.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc) and EQQX.DE (Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc) are both Nasdaq-100 funds tracking the Nasdaq 100®, from Amundi and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LYMS.DE returned 18.88%/yr vs 19.11%/yr for EQQX.DE. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LYMS.DE charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EQQX.DE.

Performance

LYMS.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) and Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LYMS.DE having a 20.63% return and EQQX.DE slightly higher at 21.61%.

LYMS.DE

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 7.96%
• YTD: 20.63%
• 6M: 18.72%
• 1Y: 37.20%
• 3Y*: 24.71%
• 5Y*: 18.88%
• 10Y*: 21.41%

EQQX.DE

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 8.86%
• YTD: 21.61%
• 6M: 19.72%
• 1Y: 38.41%
• 3Y*: 25.43%
• 5Y*: 19.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYMS.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc	20.63%	7.15%	33.72%	51.52%	-29.87%	25.99%
EQQX.DE Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc	21.61%	7.13%	33.88%	51.62%	-29.90%	26.11%

Correlation

The correlation between LYMS.DE and EQQX.DE is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	1.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2021	1.00

The correlation between LYMS.DE and EQQX.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LYMS.DE vs. EQQX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYMS.DE

LYMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 71
LYMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
LYMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
LYMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
LYMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
LYMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 63

EQQX.DE

EQQX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 74
EQQX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
EQQX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
EQQX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 75
EQQX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
EQQX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYMS.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) and Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LYMS.DE	EQQX.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	2.49	-0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	3.29	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.44	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.77	3.91	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.23	11.64	-0.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LYMS.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYMS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the EQQX.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYMS.DE and EQQX.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LYMS.DE	EQQX.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40	2.49	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94	0.95	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.90	-0.13

Drawdowns

LYMS.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYMS.DE drawdown since its inception was -50.00%, which is greater than EQQX.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYMS.DE and EQQX.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	LYMS.DE	EQQX.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.00%	-31.17%	-18.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.02%	-9.97%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.74%	-26.80%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.12%	-31.17%	+0.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.86%	0.00%	-0.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.78%	-7.99%	-0.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.37%	3.36%	+0.01%

Volatility

LYMS.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQX.DE) at 4.15%. This indicates that LYMS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LYMS.DE	EQQX.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.37%	4.15%	+0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.99%	10.89%	+0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.73%	15.75%	-0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.91%	19.86%	+0.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.68%	19.79%	-0.11%

LYMS.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYMS.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than EQQX.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LYMS.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYMS.DE nor EQQX.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQQX.DE Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.65%	0.69%	0.76%	1.09%	1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LYMS.DE and EQQX.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, LYMS.DE and EQQX.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, LYMS.DE or EQQX.DE?

On fees, EQQX.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LYMS.DE or EQQX.DE?

EQQX.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for LYMS.DE.

What is the main difference between LYMS.DE and EQQX.DE?

Both ETFs track Nasdaq 100®. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for LYMS.DE and 0.20% for EQQX.DE.