PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYMS.DE vs. AUM5.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYMS.DE vs. AUM5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) and Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (AUM5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYMS.DE achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly higher than AUM5.DE's 11.38% return. Over the past 10 years, LYMS.DE has outperformed AUM5.DE with an annualized return of 21.41%, while AUM5.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 15.11% annualized return.


LYMS.DE

1D
-0.86%
1M
7.96%
YTD
20.63%
6M
18.72%
1Y
37.20%
3Y*
24.71%
5Y*
18.88%
10Y*
21.41%

AUM5.DE

1D
-0.16%
1M
4.40%
YTD
11.38%
6M
10.89%
1Y
25.63%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
14.88%
10Y*
15.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYMS.DE vs. AUM5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYMS.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc
20.63%7.15%33.72%51.52%-29.87%39.59%34.60%42.84%3.18%15.91%
AUM5.DE
Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR
11.38%4.80%32.39%22.64%-14.14%40.96%7.10%34.94%-1.01%6.82%

Correlation

The correlation between LYMS.DE and AUM5.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2010

0.89

The correlation between LYMS.DE and AUM5.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYMS.DE vs. AUM5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYMS.DE
LYMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
LYMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

AUM5.DE
AUM5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
AUM5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUM5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUM5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AUM5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUM5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYMS.DE vs. AUM5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) and Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (AUM5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYMS.DEAUM5.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.41

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

3.57

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.23

12.74

-1.51

LYMS.DE vs. AUM5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYMS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the AUM5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYMS.DE and AUM5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYMS.DEAUM5.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.20

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.97

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.08

0.93

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.96

-0.19

Drawdowns

LYMS.DE vs. AUM5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYMS.DE drawdown since its inception was -50.00%, which is greater than AUM5.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYMS.DE and AUM5.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYMS.DEAUM5.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.00%

-33.66%

-16.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.02%

-7.15%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.74%

-23.30%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.12%

-23.30%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.12%

-33.66%

+2.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-0.46%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.78%

-4.00%

-4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

2.01%

+1.36%

Volatility

LYMS.DE vs. AUM5.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (AUM5.DE) at 2.63%. This indicates that LYMS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUM5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYMS.DEAUM5.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

2.63%

+1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.99%

7.61%

+3.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.73%

11.64%

+4.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.91%

15.19%

+4.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.68%

16.07%

+3.61%

LYMS.DE vs. AUM5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYMS.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than AUM5.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LYMS.DE vs. AUM5.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYMS.DE nor AUM5.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUM5.DE
Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LYMS.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.65%0.69%0.76%1.09%1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, LYMS.DE and AUM5.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, AUM5.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AUM5.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for LYMS.DE.

LYMS.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while AUM5.DE is S&P 500. LYMS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while AUM5.DE tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for LYMS.DE and 0.15% for AUM5.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYMS.DE and AUM5.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer