LYMH.DE vs. H41E.DE

Last updated Jul 4, 2026

LYMH.DE (Amundi MSCI Greece UCITS ETF (Dist)) and H41E.DE (HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets Value ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - LYMH.DE tracks the MSCI Greece IMI + Coca-Cola 20/35 Index while H41E.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Value SRI ESG Target Select. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LYMH.DE returned 30.77%/yr vs 26.60%/yr for H41E.DE. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LYMH.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for H41E.DE.

Performance

LYMH.DE vs. H41E.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Greece UCITS ETF (Dist) (LYMH.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets Value ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H41E.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYMH.DE achieves a 24.02% return, which is significantly lower than H41E.DE's 36.54% return.

LYMH.DE

• 1D: 1.43%
• 1M: 10.51%
• 6M: 20.85%
• YTD: 24.02%
• 1Y: 34.86%
• 3Y*: 30.77%
• 5Y*: 26.77%
• 10Y*: 18.24%

H41E.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -3.57%
• 6M: 33.19%
• YTD: 36.54%
• 1Y: 60.16%
• 3Y*: 26.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYMH.DE vs. H41E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
LYMH.DE Amundi MSCI Greece UCITS ETF (Dist)	24.02%	54.23%	17.75%	39.74%	0.70%
H41E.DE HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets Value ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	36.54%	22.02%	17.74%	11.43%	-2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between LYMH.DE and H41E.DE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2022	0.36

Return for Risk

LYMH.DE vs. H41E.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYMH.DE

LYMH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 50
LYMH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
LYMH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
LYMH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 52
LYMH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
LYMH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 42

H41E.DE

H41E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 94
H41E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
H41E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
H41E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 93
H41E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
H41E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYMH.DE vs. H41E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Greece UCITS ETF (Dist) (LYMH.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets Value ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H41E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LYMH.DE	H41E.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	3.07	-1.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	3.89	-1.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.54	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	6.17	-4.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.75	19.26	-13.51

LYMH.DE vs. H41E.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYMH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the H41E.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYMH.DE and H41E.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LYMH.DE vs. H41E.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYMH.DE drawdown since its inception was -96.06%, which is greater than H41E.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYMH.DE and H41E.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	LYMH.DE	H41E.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.06%	-20.92%	-75.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.29%	-9.80%	-7.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.81%	-20.92%	+3.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-73.27%	-8.20%	-65.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-85.13%	-3.13%	-82.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.05%	3.13%	+2.92%

Volatility

LYMH.DE vs. H41E.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Greece UCITS ETF (Dist) (LYMH.DE) is 4.41%, while HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets Value ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H41E.DE) has a volatility of 9.36%. This indicates that LYMH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H41E.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LYMH.DE	H41E.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.41%	9.36%	-4.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.33%	16.87%	+2.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.95%	19.74%	+3.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.88%	16.62%	+5.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.34%	16.62%	+7.72%

LYMH.DE vs. H41E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYMH.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than H41E.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

LYMH.DE vs. H41E.DE - Dividend Comparison

LYMH.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, while H41E.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
H41E.DE HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets Value ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LYMH.DE Amundi MSCI Greece UCITS ETF (Dist)	2.46%	3.06%	3.92%	2.22%	2.02%	2.03%	1.14%	1.89%	2.77%	2.02%	1.22%	1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LYMH.DE and H41E.DE in my portfolio?

LYMH.DE and H41E.DE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LYMH.DE or H41E.DE?

On fees, H41E.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LYMH.DE or H41E.DE?

H41E.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LYMH.DE.

What is the main difference between LYMH.DE and H41E.DE?

LYMH.DE tracks MSCI Greece IMI + Coca-Cola 20/35 Index, while H41E.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Value SRI ESG Target Select. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LYMH.DE and 0.35% for H41E.DE.