PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYMD.DE vs. ZPRA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYMD.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYMD.DE) and SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (ZPRA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYMD.DE achieves a -11.03% return, which is significantly lower than ZPRA.DE's 4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, LYMD.DE has underperformed ZPRA.DE with an annualized return of 6.18%, while ZPRA.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 6.59% annualized return.


LYMD.DE

1D
0.99%
1M
-3.80%
YTD
-11.03%
6M
-12.28%
1Y
-15.14%
3Y*
1.77%
5Y*
3.60%
10Y*
6.18%

ZPRA.DE

1D
-0.22%
1M
-0.50%
YTD
4.42%
6M
3.12%
1Y
11.10%
3Y*
10.45%
5Y*
5.15%
10Y*
6.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYMD.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYMD.DE
Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc
-11.03%-10.62%15.81%14.99%-2.96%34.12%2.23%9.49%-5.04%20.43%
ZPRA.DE
SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.42%9.80%11.25%11.54%-10.70%12.81%-9.50%24.48%-4.62%13.94%

Correlation

The correlation between LYMD.DE and ZPRA.DE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2013

0.48

The correlation between LYMD.DE and ZPRA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (3 years) to 0.49 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYMD.DE vs. ZPRA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYMD.DE
LYMD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
LYMD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYMD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYMD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
LYMD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYMD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPRA.DE
ZPRA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ZPRA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPRA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPRA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPRA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPRA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYMD.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYMD.DE) and SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (ZPRA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYMD.DEZPRA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.20

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

1.93

-2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.49

5.05

-6.54

LYMD.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYMD.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the ZPRA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYMD.DE and ZPRA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYMD.DEZPRA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.91

1.11

-2.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.39

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.46

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.41

-0.23

Drawdowns

LYMD.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYMD.DE drawdown since its inception was -68.71%, which is greater than ZPRA.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYMD.DE and ZPRA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYMD.DEZPRA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.71%

-31.54%

-37.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.60%

-5.57%

-15.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.55%

-13.55%

-16.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.55%

-21.66%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.38%

-31.54%

-9.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.17%

-2.76%

-23.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.32%

-6.47%

-11.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.84%

2.13%

+7.71%

Volatility

LYMD.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYMD.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (ZPRA.DE) at 2.71%. This indicates that LYMD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPRA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYMD.DEZPRA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

2.71%

+2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.24%

7.42%

+5.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.06%

9.67%

+6.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

12.92%

+3.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.15%

14.47%

+5.68%

LYMD.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYMD.DE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPRA.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYMD.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Dividend Comparison

LYMD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZPRA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LYMD.DE
Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZPRA.DE
SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.87%3.01%2.98%2.92%3.64%4.00%3.04%2.62%2.41%1.78%2.25%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYMD.DE and ZPRA.DE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPRA.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPRA.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for LYMD.DE.

LYMD.DE tracks MSCI India, while ZPRA.DE tracks S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for LYMD.DE and 0.55% for ZPRA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYMD.DE and ZPRA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer