LYMD.DE vs. XCS4.DE
LYMD.DE (Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and XCS4.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - LYMD.DE tracks the MSCI India while XCS4.DE tracks the MSCI Thailand. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LYMD.DE returned 6.18%/yr vs 4.54%/yr for XCS4.DE. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LYMD.DE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XCS4.DE.
Performance
LYMD.DE vs. XCS4.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYMD.DE achieves a -11.03% return, which is significantly lower than XCS4.DE's 29.46% return. Over the past 10 years, LYMD.DE has outperformed XCS4.DE with an annualized return of 6.18%, while XCS4.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 4.54% annualized return.
LYMD.DE
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -3.80%
- YTD
- -11.03%
- 6M
- -12.28%
- 1Y
- -15.14%
- 3Y*
- 1.77%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- 6.18%
XCS4.DE
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 5.08%
- YTD
- 29.46%
- 6M
- 30.06%
- 1Y
- 51.12%
- 3Y*
- 7.20%
- 5Y*
- 5.01%
- 10Y*
- 4.54%
LYMD.DE vs. XCS4.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYMD.DE Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc | -11.03% | -10.62% | 15.81% | 14.99% | -2.96% | 34.12% | 2.23% | 9.49% | -5.04% | 20.43% |
XCS4.DE Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C | 29.46% | -3.83% | 7.49% | -15.52% | 11.15% | 6.09% | -19.52% | 11.73% | -1.47% | 17.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYMD.DE and XCS4.DE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2011 | 0.48 |
The correlation between LYMD.DE and XCS4.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (3 years) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYMD.DE vs. XCS4.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LYMD.DE
XCS4.DE
LYMD.DE vs. XCS4.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYMD.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCS4.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYMD.DE | XCS4.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.40 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 4.91 | -5.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 14.58 | -16.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYMD.DE | XCS4.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.91 | 2.35 | -3.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.28 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.23 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.23 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
LYMD.DE vs. XCS4.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYMD.DE drawdown since its inception was -68.71%, which is greater than XCS4.DE's maximum drawdown of -45.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYMD.DE and XCS4.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYMD.DE | XCS4.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.71% | -45.06% | -23.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.60% | -10.38% | -10.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.55% | -29.85% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.55% | -34.04% | +4.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.38% | -45.06% | +3.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.17% | -0.16% | -26.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.32% | -15.35% | -2.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.84% | 3.50% | +6.34% |
Volatility
LYMD.DE vs. XCS4.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYMD.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCS4.DE) have volatilities of 5.64% and 5.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYMD.DE | XCS4.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 5.83% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.24% | 16.61% | -3.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.06% | 21.68% | -5.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 17.74% | -1.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 19.70% | +0.45% |
LYMD.DE vs. XCS4.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYMD.DE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XCS4.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
LYMD.DE vs. XCS4.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LYMD.DE nor XCS4.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LYMD.DE and XCS4.DE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCS4.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCS4.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for LYMD.DE.
LYMD.DE tracks MSCI India, while XCS4.DE tracks MSCI Thailand. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for LYMD.DE and 0.50% for XCS4.DE.
Find the right allocation for LYMD.DE and XCS4.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer