LYMD.DE vs. FVSJ.DE
LYMD.DE (Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and FVSJ.DE (Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - LYMD.DE tracks the MSCI India while FVSJ.DE tracks the FTSE Asia ex Japan ex China. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LYMD.DE returned 3.60%/yr vs 14.63%/yr for FVSJ.DE. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LYMD.DE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FVSJ.DE.
Performance
LYMD.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYMD.DE achieves a -11.03% return, which is significantly lower than FVSJ.DE's 45.45% return.
LYMD.DE
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -3.80%
- YTD
- -11.03%
- 6M
- -12.28%
- 1Y
- -15.14%
- 3Y*
- 1.77%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- 6.18%
FVSJ.DE
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 45.45%
- 6M
- 48.21%
- 1Y
- 72.24%
- 3Y*
- 25.93%
- 5Y*
- 14.63%
- 10Y*
- —
LYMD.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYMD.DE Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc | -11.03% | -10.62% | 15.81% | 14.99% | -2.96% | 34.12% | 2.23% | 9.49% | 2.98% |
FVSJ.DE Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF | 45.45% | 15.41% | 14.01% | 8.23% | -7.58% | 13.71% | -3.67% | 13.83% | -5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYMD.DE and FVSJ.DE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018 | 0.58 |
The correlation between LYMD.DE and FVSJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYMD.DE vs. FVSJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LYMD.DE
FVSJ.DE
LYMD.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYMD.DE) and Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF (FVSJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYMD.DE | FVSJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.64 | -0.78 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 6.17 | -6.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 23.31 | -24.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYMD.DE | FVSJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.91 | 3.60 | -4.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.94 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.65 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
LYMD.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYMD.DE drawdown since its inception was -68.71%, which is greater than FVSJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYMD.DE and FVSJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYMD.DE | FVSJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.71% | -26.95% | -41.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.60% | -11.93% | -8.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.55% | -21.76% | -7.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.55% | -21.76% | -7.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.17% | -2.76% | -23.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.32% | -5.16% | -13.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.84% | 3.16% | +6.68% |
Volatility
LYMD.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYMD.DE) is 5.64%, while Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF (FVSJ.DE) has a volatility of 9.05%. This indicates that LYMD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FVSJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYMD.DE | FVSJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 9.05% | -3.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.24% | 17.69% | -4.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.06% | 20.43% | -4.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 15.44% | +0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 17.16% | +2.99% |
LYMD.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYMD.DE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FVSJ.DE's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
LYMD.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LYMD.DE nor FVSJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LYMD.DE and FVSJ.DE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FVSJ.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FVSJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for LYMD.DE.
LYMD.DE tracks MSCI India, while FVSJ.DE tracks FTSE Asia ex Japan ex China. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for LYMD.DE and 0.14% for FVSJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for LYMD.DE and FVSJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer