LYM9.DE vs. IS0D.DE
LYM9.DE (Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist) and IS0D.DE (iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - LYM9.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI IMI New Energy ESG Filtered while IS0D.DE tracks the S&P Commodity Producers Oil & Gas Exploration & Production. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LYM9.DE returned 11.14%/yr vs 6.95%/yr for IS0D.DE. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LYM9.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for IS0D.DE.
Performance
LYM9.DE vs. IS0D.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYM9.DE achieves a 37.23% return, which is significantly higher than IS0D.DE's 30.64% return. Over the past 10 years, LYM9.DE has outperformed IS0D.DE with an annualized return of 11.14%, while IS0D.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.95% annualized return.
LYM9.DE
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 37.23%
- 6M
- 36.72%
- 1Y
- 74.72%
- 3Y*
- 8.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- 11.14%
IS0D.DE
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 30.64%
- 6M
- 22.28%
- 1Y
- 36.59%
- 3Y*
- 11.88%
- 5Y*
- 17.33%
- 10Y*
- 6.95%
LYM9.DE vs. IS0D.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYM9.DE Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist | 37.23% | 29.63% | -7.97% | -21.17% | -13.14% | 1.12% | 46.11% | 50.04% | -9.16% | 15.64% |
IS0D.DE iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF | 30.64% | -4.44% | 3.13% | -0.98% | 44.39% | 86.31% | -39.08% | 13.51% | -18.94% | -15.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYM9.DE and IS0D.DE is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2012 | 0.42 |
The correlation between LYM9.DE and IS0D.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYM9.DE vs. IS0D.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LYM9.DE
IS0D.DE
LYM9.DE vs. IS0D.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM9.DE) and iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (IS0D.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYM9.DE | IS0D.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.24 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.45 | 2.02 | +7.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 31.90 | 5.02 | +26.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYM9.DE | IS0D.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65 | 1.33 | +2.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.56 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.21 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.09 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
LYM9.DE vs. IS0D.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYM9.DE drawdown since its inception was -72.01%, smaller than the maximum IS0D.DE drawdown of -79.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYM9.DE and IS0D.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYM9.DE | IS0D.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.01% | -79.47% | +7.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.81% | -17.75% | +9.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.61% | -30.80% | -10.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.00% | -32.34% | -22.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.00% | -73.73% | +18.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.77% | -9.82% | +7.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.85% | -27.09% | -15.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 7.18% | -4.86% |
Volatility
LYM9.DE vs. IS0D.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM9.DE) and iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (IS0D.DE) have volatilities of 7.97% and 7.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYM9.DE | IS0D.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 7.78% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.84% | 22.48% | -6.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.25% | 26.99% | -6.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.20% | 30.37% | -8.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.82% | 33.12% | -11.30% |
LYM9.DE vs. IS0D.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYM9.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IS0D.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
LYM9.DE vs. IS0D.DE - Dividend Comparison
LYM9.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, while IS0D.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS0D.DE iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LYM9.DE Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist | 0.31% | 0.42% | 0.74% | 0.78% | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.70% | 1.12% | 0.67% | 0.89% | 1.50% | 2.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LYM9.DE and IS0D.DE have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IS0D.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IS0D.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for LYM9.DE.
LYM9.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI New Energy ESG Filtered, while IS0D.DE tracks S&P Commodity Producers Oil & Gas Exploration & Production. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for LYM9.DE and 0.55% for IS0D.DE.
Find the right allocation for LYM9.DE and IS0D.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer