LYBK.DE vs. LVWC.DE
LYBK.DE (Amundi Euro Stoxx Banks UCITS ETF Acc) and LVWC.DE (Amundi MSCI World 2x Leveraged UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LYBK.DE is a Financials Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX® Banks, while LVWC.DE is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Leveraged 2x Daily Net Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LYBK.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for LVWC.DE.
Performance
LYBK.DE vs. LVWC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYBK.DE achieves a 5.35% return, which is significantly lower than LVWC.DE's 17.92% return.
LYBK.DE
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 5.35%
- 6M
- 12.73%
- 1Y
- 39.28%
- 3Y*
- 45.91%
- 5Y*
- 29.06%
- 10Y*
- —
LVWC.DE
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 17.92%
- 6M
- 18.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LYBK.DE vs. LVWC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LYBK.DE Amundi Euro Stoxx Banks UCITS ETF Acc | 5.35% | 15.98% |
LVWC.DE Amundi MSCI World 2x Leveraged UCITS ETF | 17.92% | 2.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYBK.DE and LVWC.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYBK.DE vs. LVWC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LYBK.DE
LVWC.DE
LYBK.DE vs. LVWC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Euro Stoxx Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LYBK.DE) and Amundi MSCI World 2x Leveraged UCITS ETF (LVWC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYBK.DE | LVWC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.56 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYBK.DE | LVWC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 1.44 | -0.98 |
Drawdowns
LYBK.DE vs. LVWC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYBK.DE drawdown since its inception was -62.22%, which is greater than LVWC.DE's maximum drawdown of -14.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYBK.DE and LVWC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYBK.DE | LVWC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.22% | -14.47% | -47.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -0.89% | -0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.62% | -2.96% | -16.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.47% | — | — |
Volatility
LYBK.DE vs. LVWC.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYBK.DE | LVWC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.84% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.19% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.95% | 24.20% | -0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.45% | 24.20% | +1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.55% | 24.20% | +4.35% |
LYBK.DE vs. LVWC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYBK.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LVWC.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
LYBK.DE vs. LVWC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LYBK.DE nor LVWC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LYBK.DE and LVWC.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYBK.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYBK.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for LVWC.DE.
LYBK.DE is categorized as Financials Equities, while LVWC.DE is Leveraged Equities. LYBK.DE tracks EURO STOXX® Banks, while LVWC.DE tracks MSCI World Leveraged 2x Daily Net Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LYBK.DE and 0.60% for LVWC.DE.
Find the right allocation for LYBK.DE and LVWC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer