LWCR.DE vs. WRLD.DE
LWCR.DE (Amundi MSCI World ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Acc) and WRLD.DE (Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - LWCR.DE tracks the MSCI World ESG Broad CTB Select while WRLD.DE tracks the Foxberry SMS Environmental Impact 100. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LWCR.DE returned 22.75% vs 26.89% for WRLD.DE. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LWCR.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for WRLD.DE.
Performance
LWCR.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LWCR.DE achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly lower than WRLD.DE's 18.45% return.
LWCR.DE
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 3.86%
- YTD
- 10.62%
- 6M
- 10.78%
- 1Y
- 22.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WRLD.DE
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 18.45%
- 6M
- 18.65%
- 1Y
- 26.89%
- 3Y*
- 10.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LWCR.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LWCR.DE Amundi MSCI World ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Acc | 10.62% | 6.71% | 25.11% | 2.33% |
WRLD.DE Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF | 18.45% | 11.71% | 1.59% | 4.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between LWCR.DE and WRLD.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023 | 0.71 |
The correlation between LWCR.DE and WRLD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LWCR.DE vs. WRLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LWCR.DE
WRLD.DE
LWCR.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Acc (LWCR.DE) and Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LWCR.DE | WRLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.34 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 3.57 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.17 | 11.33 | +0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LWCR.DE | WRLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 1.91 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 0.38 | +0.92 |
Drawdowns
LWCR.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LWCR.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.67%, smaller than the maximum WRLD.DE drawdown of -23.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LWCR.DE and WRLD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LWCR.DE | WRLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.67% | -23.55% | +1.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.28% | -7.90% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.38% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.80% | -9.51% | +6.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 2.50% | -0.63% |
Volatility
LWCR.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI World ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Acc (LWCR.DE) is 2.63%, while Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that LWCR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WRLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LWCR.DE | WRLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 4.50% | -1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.04% | 11.34% | -3.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.52% | 14.81% | -3.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 16.98% | -3.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 16.98% | -3.08% |
LWCR.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LWCR.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than WRLD.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
LWCR.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LWCR.DE nor WRLD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LWCR.DE and WRLD.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LWCR.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LWCR.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for WRLD.DE.
LWCR.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Broad CTB Select, while WRLD.DE tracks Foxberry SMS Environmental Impact 100. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LWCR.DE and 0.55% for WRLD.DE.
Find the right allocation for LWCR.DE and WRLD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer