LWCR.DE vs. SBIM.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LWCR.DE (Amundi MSCI World ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Acc) and SBIM.DE (Amundi Index MSCI Emerging ESG Broad CTB UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LWCR.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ESG Broad CTB Select, while SBIM.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Broad CTB Select. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LWCR.DE returned 22.75% vs 47.90% for SBIM.DE. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LWCR.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SBIM.DE.

Performance

LWCR.DE vs. SBIM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Acc (LWCR.DE) and Amundi Index MSCI Emerging ESG Broad CTB UCITS ETF (SBIM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LWCR.DE achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly lower than SBIM.DE's 26.80% return.

LWCR.DE

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 3.86%
• YTD: 10.62%
• 6M: 10.78%
• 1Y: 22.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SBIM.DE

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: 3.81%
• YTD: 26.80%
• 6M: 27.28%
• 1Y: 47.90%
• 3Y*: 20.34%
• 5Y*: 7.90%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LWCR.DE vs. SBIM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LWCR.DE Amundi MSCI World ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Acc	10.62%	6.71%	25.11%	2.33%
SBIM.DE Amundi Index MSCI Emerging ESG Broad CTB UCITS ETF	26.80%	19.60%	13.97%	2.14%

Correlation

The correlation between LWCR.DE and SBIM.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023	0.65

The correlation between LWCR.DE and SBIM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LWCR.DE vs. SBIM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LWCR.DE

LWCR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 62
LWCR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
LWCR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
LWCR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 61
LWCR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
LWCR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 67

SBIM.DE

SBIM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 82
SBIM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
SBIM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
SBIM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 82
SBIM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
SBIM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LWCR.DE vs. SBIM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Acc (LWCR.DE) and Amundi Index MSCI Emerging ESG Broad CTB UCITS ETF (SBIM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LWCR.DE	SBIM.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	2.68	-0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	3.60	-0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.48	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	4.37	-1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.17	15.92	-3.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LWCR.DE vs. SBIM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LWCR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the SBIM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LWCR.DE and SBIM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LWCR.DE	SBIM.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	2.68	-0.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.30	0.69	+0.61

Drawdowns

LWCR.DE vs. SBIM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LWCR.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.67%, smaller than the maximum SBIM.DE drawdown of -26.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LWCR.DE and SBIM.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	LWCR.DE	SBIM.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.67%	-26.22%	+4.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.28%	-11.10%	+3.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.55%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	-2.43%	+2.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.80%	-10.36%	+7.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.87%	3.05%	-1.18%

Volatility

LWCR.DE vs. SBIM.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI World ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Acc (LWCR.DE) is 2.63%, while Amundi Index MSCI Emerging ESG Broad CTB UCITS ETF (SBIM.DE) has a volatility of 7.34%. This indicates that LWCR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LWCR.DE	SBIM.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.63%	7.34%	-4.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.04%	15.35%	-7.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.52%	18.09%	-6.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.90%	16.67%	-2.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.90%	16.63%	-2.73%

LWCR.DE vs. SBIM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LWCR.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SBIM.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LWCR.DE vs. SBIM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LWCR.DE nor SBIM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LWCR.DE and SBIM.DE in my portfolio?

LWCR.DE and SBIM.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LWCR.DE or SBIM.DE?

On fees, SBIM.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LWCR.DE or SBIM.DE?

SBIM.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LWCR.DE.

What is the main difference between LWCR.DE and SBIM.DE?

LWCR.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while SBIM.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. LWCR.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Broad CTB Select, while SBIM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Broad CTB Select. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LWCR.DE and 0.20% for SBIM.DE.