PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVWC.DE vs. WEBG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVWC.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World 2x Leveraged UCITS ETF (LVWC.DE) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist (WEBG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVWC.DE achieves a 17.92% return, which is significantly higher than WEBG.DE's 12.80% return.


LVWC.DE

1D
0.17%
1M
5.71%
YTD
17.92%
6M
18.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WEBG.DE

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.70%
YTD
12.80%
6M
12.74%
1Y
26.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVWC.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LVWC.DE and WEBG.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2025

0.95

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVWC.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World 2x Leveraged UCITS ETF (LVWC.DE) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist (WEBG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LVWC.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LVWC.DEWEBG.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.44

1.24

+0.19

Drawdowns

LVWC.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVWC.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.47%, smaller than the maximum WEBG.DE drawdown of -21.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVWC.DE and WEBG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVWC.DEWEBG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.47%

-21.31%

+6.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-0.63%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.96%

-2.81%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

Volatility

LVWC.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVWC.DEWEBG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.20%

11.48%

+12.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.20%

14.15%

+10.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.20%

14.15%

+10.05%

LVWC.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVWC.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than WEBG.DE's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

LVWC.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LVWC.DE nor WEBG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, LVWC.DE and WEBG.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, WEBG.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WEBG.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for LVWC.DE.

LVWC.DE is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while WEBG.DE is Global Equities. LVWC.DE tracks MSCI World Leveraged 2x Daily Net Index, while WEBG.DE tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for LVWC.DE and 0.07% for WEBG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVWC.DE and WEBG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer