PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVPIX vs. YAFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVPIX vs. YAFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Large Cap Value ProFund (LVPIX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVPIX achieves a 6.67% return, which is significantly lower than YAFFX's 31.39% return. Over the past 10 years, LVPIX has underperformed YAFFX with an annualized return of 9.62%, while YAFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.94% annualized return.


LVPIX

1D
-0.55%
1M
1.39%
YTD
6.67%
6M
7.34%
1Y
19.76%
3Y*
12.74%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
9.62%

YAFFX

1D
3.61%
1M
10.56%
YTD
31.39%
6M
15.83%
1Y
29.44%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
12.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVPIX vs. YAFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVPIX
ProFunds Large Cap Value ProFund
6.67%11.31%7.60%19.78%-6.86%22.81%-0.60%29.32%-10.35%12.88%
YAFFX
AMG Yacktman Focused Fund
31.39%3.89%9.30%16.53%-8.20%16.48%17.22%19.21%2.99%20.07%

Correlation

The correlation between LVPIX and YAFFX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2002

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between LVPIX and YAFFX has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVPIX vs. YAFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVPIX
LVPIX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LVPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LVPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

YAFFX
YAFFX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
YAFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YAFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
YAFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
YAFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
YAFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVPIX vs. YAFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Large Cap Value ProFund (LVPIX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LVPIXYAFFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.05

1.38

+0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.87

1.51

+1.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.37

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

1.76

+1.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.90

6.40

+5.50

LVPIX vs. YAFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the YAFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVPIX and YAFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LVPIXYAFFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

1.38

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.58

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.79

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.62

-0.22

Drawdowns

LVPIX vs. YAFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVPIX drawdown since its inception was -62.54%, which is greater than YAFFX's maximum drawdown of -43.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVPIX and YAFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVPIXYAFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.54%

-43.80%

-18.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-17.08%

+10.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.80%

-18.88%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.80%

-21.31%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.21%

-30.62%

-6.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

0.00%

-0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.71%

-6.21%

-3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

4.70%

-3.01%

Volatility

LVPIX vs. YAFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProFunds Large Cap Value ProFund (LVPIX) is 2.16%, while AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that LVPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YAFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVPIXYAFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.16%

6.09%

-3.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.07%

22.30%

-15.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.79%

22.23%

-12.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.52%

18.09%

-3.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.52%

16.53%

-0.01%

LVPIX vs. YAFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVPIX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is higher than YAFFX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

LVPIX vs. YAFFX - Dividend Comparison

LVPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, while YAFFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVPIX
ProFunds Large Cap Value ProFund
4.13%4.40%0.00%0.00%0.17%0.67%0.00%0.00%3.93%0.64%0.22%1.26%
YAFFX
AMG Yacktman Focused Fund
0.00%0.00%18.44%4.42%7.60%4.70%11.87%15.84%22.15%11.82%11.81%24.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVPIX and YAFFX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YAFFX has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to LVPIX (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVPIX dropped -62.54% vs YAFFX's -43.80%.

LVPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVPIX and YAFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer