PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVPIX vs. FLCCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVPIX vs. FLCCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Large Cap Value ProFund (LVPIX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C (FLCCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, LVPIX has underperformed FLCCX with an annualized return of 9.62%, while FLCCX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.12% annualized return.


LVPIX

1D
-0.55%
1M
1.39%
YTD
6.67%
6M
7.34%
1Y
19.76%
3Y*
12.74%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
9.62%

FLCCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
12.16%
3Y*
18.09%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVPIX vs. FLCCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVPIX
ProFunds Large Cap Value ProFund
6.67%11.31%7.60%19.78%-6.86%22.81%-0.60%29.32%-10.35%12.88%
FLCCX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C
0.00%18.58%25.08%22.21%-8.85%24.54%7.70%30.36%-9.25%16.67%

Correlation

The correlation between LVPIX and FLCCX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2002

0.93

Over the past year, the correlation between LVPIX and FLCCX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.93, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVPIX vs. FLCCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVPIX
LVPIX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LVPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LVPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCCX
FLCCX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FLCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVPIX vs. FLCCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Large Cap Value ProFund (LVPIX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C (FLCCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LVPIXFLCCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.05

1.83

+0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.87

2.56

+0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.49

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

5.84

-2.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.90

10.61

+1.29

LVPIX vs. FLCCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the FLCCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVPIX and FLCCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LVPIXFLCCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

1.83

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.71

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.72

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.43

-0.02

Drawdowns

LVPIX vs. FLCCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVPIX drawdown since its inception was -62.54%, roughly equal to the maximum FLCCX drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVPIX and FLCCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVPIXFLCCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.54%

-65.81%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-5.10%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.80%

-19.06%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.80%

-22.04%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.21%

-37.63%

+0.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-4.23%

+3.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.71%

-15.48%

+5.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

2.81%

-1.12%

Volatility

LVPIX vs. FLCCX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds Large Cap Value ProFund (LVPIX) has a higher volatility of 2.16% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C (FLCCX) at 0.00%. This indicates that LVPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVPIXFLCCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.16%

0.00%

+2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.07%

4.23%

+2.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.79%

8.08%

+1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.52%

16.44%

-1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.52%

18.59%

-2.07%

LVPIX vs. FLCCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVPIX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCCX's 1.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

LVPIX vs. FLCCX - Dividend Comparison

LVPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, less than FLCCX's 6.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCCX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C
6.79%6.79%6.81%3.27%1.77%6.87%5.44%8.90%18.35%7.06%1.65%2.52%
LVPIX
ProFunds Large Cap Value ProFund
4.13%4.40%0.00%0.00%0.17%0.67%0.00%0.00%3.93%0.64%0.22%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVPIX and FLCCX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LVPIX has higher volatility (2.16%) compared to FLCCX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVPIX dropped -62.54% vs FLCCX's -65.81%.

LVPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVPIX and FLCCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer