LVAZX vs. WAFMX
LVAZX (LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund) and WAFMX (Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, LVAZX returned 15.08%/yr vs -2.96%/yr for WAFMX. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LVAZX charges 1.45%/yr vs 2.15%/yr for WAFMX.
Performance
LVAZX vs. WAFMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVAZX achieves a 25.74% return, which is significantly higher than WAFMX's 0.56% return.
LVAZX
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 15.39%
- YTD
- 25.74%
- 1Y
- 48.21%
- 3Y*
- 26.11%
- 5Y*
- 15.08%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.08%
WAFMX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -3.21%
- 6M
- -4.49%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- -2.43%
- 3Y*
- 7.20%
- 5Y*
- -2.96%
- 10Y*
- 3.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
LVAZX vs. WAFMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVAZX LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 25.74% | 39.90% | 7.26% | 21.26% | -13.03% | 13.77% | 5.03% | 5.91% |
WAFMX Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund | 0.56% | 4.35% | 10.67% | 28.16% | -41.11% | 8.60% | 28.24% | 18.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVAZX and WAFMX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2019 | 0.62 |
The correlation between LVAZX and WAFMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVAZX vs. WAFMX — Risk / Return Rank
LVAZX
WAFMX
LVAZX vs. WAFMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund (LVAZX) and Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund (WAFMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVAZX | WAFMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 0.98 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.03 | -0.21 | +4.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.00 | -0.50 | +12.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVAZX vs. WAFMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVAZX drawdown since its inception was -37.87%, smaller than the maximum WAFMX drawdown of -49.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVAZX and WAFMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVAZX | WAFMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.87% | -49.51% | +11.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.58% | -12.85% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.02% | -15.26% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.07% | -49.51% | +22.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.89% | -21.32% | +13.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.76% | -16.82% | +10.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 5.35% | -1.47% |
Volatility
LVAZX vs. WAFMX - Volatility Comparison
LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund (LVAZX) has a higher volatility of 8.10% compared to Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund (WAFMX) at 4.02%. This indicates that LVAZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WAFMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVAZX | WAFMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.10% | 4.02% | +4.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.30% | 12.71% | +5.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.95% | 15.09% | +4.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.34% | 17.63% | -2.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.41% | 16.94% | -0.53% |
LVAZX vs. WAFMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVAZX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is lower than WAFMX's 2.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVAZX vs. WAFMX - Dividend Comparison
LVAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, while WAFMX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVAZX LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 4.07% | 5.12% | 1.39% | 4.58% | 3.14% | 8.50% | 2.54% | 2.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WAFMX Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVAZX and WAFMX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LVAZX has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to WAFMX (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVAZX dropped -37.87% vs WAFMX's -49.51%.
LVAZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVAZX and WAFMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer