PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUNR vs. TSCO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LUNR vs. TSCO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) and Tesco PLC (TSCO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LUNR is traded in USD, while TSCO.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the TSCO.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUNR achieves a 64.02% return, which is significantly higher than TSCO.L's 8.86% return.


LUNR

1D
-13.12%
1M
-25.39%
YTD
64.02%
6M
122.39%
1Y
144.44%
3Y*
42.24%
5Y*
10Y*

TSCO.L

1D
0.71%
1M
3.54%
YTD
8.86%
6M
9.85%
1Y
22.72%
3Y*
28.84%
5Y*
18.74%
10Y*
15.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUNR vs. TSCO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LUNR
Intuitive Machines Inc.
64.02%-10.63%610.76%-74.45%3.73%-0.10%
TSCO.L
Tesco PLC
8.86%33.84%29.58%41.90%-27.47%4.11%

Correlation

The correlation between LUNR and TSCO.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021

0.02

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LUNR:

$3.94T

TSCO.L:

£30.04B

EPS

LUNR:

-$0.00

TSCO.L:

£0.54

PS Ratio

LUNR:

2.95K

TSCO.L:

0.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

LUNR:

$334.27M

TSCO.L:

£143.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LUNR:

$85.92M

TSCO.L:

£10.94B

EBITDA (TTM)

LUNR:

-$96.76M

TSCO.L:

£8.93B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LUNR vs. TSCO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUNR
LUNR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
LUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
LUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

TSCO.L
TSCO.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
TSCO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSCO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSCO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
TSCO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSCO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUNR vs. TSCO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) and Tesco PLC (TSCO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LUNRTSCO.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.19

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

1.80

+1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.12

4.52

+2.60

LUNR vs. TSCO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUNR Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the TSCO.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUNR and TSCO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LUNR vs. TSCO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUNR drawdown since its inception was -97.43%, which is greater than TSCO.L's maximum drawdown of -74.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUNR and TSCO.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LUNRTSCO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.43%

-74.47%

-22.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.94%

-12.57%

-29.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.54%

-18.60%

-59.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.53%

-4.25%

-63.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.21%

-44.23%

-18.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.37%

5.01%

+15.36%

Volatility

LUNR vs. TSCO.L - Volatility Comparison

Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a higher volatility of 42.95% compared to Tesco PLC (TSCO.L) at 7.39%. This indicates that LUNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSCO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LUNRTSCO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

42.95%

7.39%

+35.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

93.42%

17.39%

+76.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

111.16%

22.26%

+88.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

171.29%

22.36%

+148.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

171.29%

24.97%

+146.32%

Dividends

LUNR vs. TSCO.L - Dividend Comparison

LUNR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSCO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LUNR
Intuitive Machines Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSCO.L
Tesco PLC
3.07%3.23%3.39%3.75%5.15%20.72%4.19%2.64%1.93%0.48%

Financials

LUNR vs. TSCO.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intuitive Machines Inc. and Tesco PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
186.73M
37.68B
(LUNR) Total Revenue
(TSCO.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. LUNR values in USD, TSCO.L values in GBP

LUNR vs. TSCO.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Intuitive Machines Inc. and Tesco PLC over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
39.0%
7.3%
Portfolio components
LUNR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported a gross profit of 72.82M and revenue of 186.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.

TSCO.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesco PLC reported a gross profit of 2.76B and revenue of 37.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.3%.

LUNR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported an operating income of -39.20M and revenue of 186.73M, resulting in an operating margin of -21.0%.

TSCO.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesco PLC reported an operating income of 1.49B and revenue of 37.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.

LUNR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported a net income of -37.55M and revenue of 186.73M, resulting in a net margin of -20.1%.

TSCO.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesco PLC reported a net income of 837.00M and revenue of 37.68B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LUNR and TSCO.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LUNR and TSCO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer