PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUNR vs. SOUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LUNR vs. SOUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) and SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUNR achieves a 64.02% return, which is significantly higher than SOUN's -30.79% return.


LUNR

1D
-13.12%
1M
-25.39%
YTD
64.02%
6M
122.39%
1Y
144.44%
3Y*
42.24%
5Y*
10Y*

SOUN

1D
-1.43%
1M
-18.05%
YTD
-30.79%
6M
-40.77%
1Y
-27.14%
3Y*
29.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUNR vs. SOUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
LUNR
Intuitive Machines Inc.
64.02%-10.63%610.76%-74.45%2.99%
SOUN
SoundHound AI, Inc.
-30.79%-49.75%835.85%19.77%-79.70%

Correlation

The correlation between LUNR and SOUN is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022

0.32

The correlation between LUNR and SOUN shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LUNR:

$3.94T

SOUN:

$2.34B

EPS

LUNR:

-$0.00

SOUN:

-$0.43

PS Ratio

LUNR:

2.95K

SOUN:

14.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

LUNR:

$334.27M

SOUN:

$183.99M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LUNR:

$85.92M

SOUN:

$69.84M

EBITDA (TTM)

LUNR:

-$96.76M

SOUN:

-$124.47M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LUNR vs. SOUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUNR
LUNR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
LUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
LUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SOUN
SOUN Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SOUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOUN Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
SOUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOUN Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUNR vs. SOUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) and SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LUNRSOUNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.00

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

-0.38

+3.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.12

-0.60

+7.72

LUNR vs. SOUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUNR Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the SOUN Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUNR and SOUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LUNR vs. SOUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUNR drawdown since its inception was -97.43%, roughly equal to the maximum SOUN drawdown of -93.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUNR and SOUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LUNRSOUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.43%

-93.55%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.94%

-72.43%

+30.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.54%

-75.65%

-2.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.53%

-71.52%

+3.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.21%

-66.93%

+3.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.37%

45.29%

-24.92%

Volatility

LUNR vs. SOUN - Volatility Comparison

Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a higher volatility of 42.95% compared to SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) at 17.69%. This indicates that LUNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SOUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LUNRSOUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

42.95%

17.69%

+25.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

93.42%

52.15%

+41.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

111.16%

80.70%

+30.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

171.29%

136.27%

+35.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

171.29%

136.27%

+35.02%

Dividends

LUNR vs. SOUN - Dividend Comparison

Neither LUNR nor SOUN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LUNR vs. SOUN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intuitive Machines Inc. and SoundHound AI, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
186.73M
44.20M
(LUNR) Total Revenue
(SOUN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LUNR and SOUN have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LUNR has higher volatility (42.95%) compared to SOUN (17.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUNR dropped -97.43% vs SOUN's -93.55%.

LUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LUNR and SOUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer