PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUNR vs. PASG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LUNR vs. PASG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) and Passage Bio, Inc. (PASG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUNR achieves a 64.02% return, which is significantly higher than PASG's -50.76% return.


LUNR

1D
-13.12%
1M
-25.39%
YTD
64.02%
6M
122.39%
1Y
144.44%
3Y*
42.24%
5Y*
10Y*

PASG

1D
3.75%
1M
5.25%
YTD
-50.76%
6M
-40.68%
1Y
-32.71%
3Y*
-32.32%
5Y*
-54.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUNR vs. PASG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LUNR
Intuitive Machines Inc.
64.02%-10.63%610.76%-74.45%3.73%-0.10%
PASG
Passage Bio, Inc.
-50.76%4.04%-43.85%-26.81%-78.27%-21.70%

Correlation

The correlation between LUNR and PASG is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LUNR:

$3.94T

PASG:

$18.63M

EPS

LUNR:

-$0.00

PASG:

-$11.85

Total Revenue (TTM)

LUNR:

$334.27M

PASG:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

LUNR:

$85.92M

PASG:

-$377.00K

EBITDA (TTM)

LUNR:

-$96.76M

PASG:

-$35.03M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LUNR vs. PASG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUNR
LUNR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
LUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
LUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

PASG
PASG Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
PASG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PASG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PASG Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PASG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
PASG Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUNR vs. PASG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) and Passage Bio, Inc. (PASG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LUNRPASGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.06

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

-0.41

+3.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.12

-0.77

+7.90

LUNR vs. PASG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUNR Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the PASG Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUNR and PASG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LUNR vs. PASG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUNR drawdown since its inception was -97.43%, roughly equal to the maximum PASG drawdown of -99.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUNR and PASG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LUNRPASGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.43%

-99.43%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.94%

-79.45%

+37.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.54%

-88.21%

+9.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.53%

-99.19%

+31.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.21%

-82.82%

+19.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.37%

42.35%

-21.98%

Volatility

LUNR vs. PASG - Volatility Comparison

Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a higher volatility of 42.95% compared to Passage Bio, Inc. (PASG) at 17.49%. This indicates that LUNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PASG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LUNRPASGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

42.95%

17.49%

+25.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

93.42%

100.45%

-7.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

111.16%

122.61%

-11.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

171.29%

100.91%

+70.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

171.29%

99.26%

+72.03%

Dividends

LUNR vs. PASG - Dividend Comparison

Neither LUNR nor PASG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LUNR vs. PASG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intuitive Machines Inc. and Passage Bio, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
186.73M
0
(LUNR) Total Revenue
(PASG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LUNR and PASG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LUNR has higher volatility (42.95%) compared to PASG (17.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUNR dropped -97.43% vs PASG's -99.43%.

LUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LUNR and PASG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer