LUNR vs. NIO
LUNR (Intuitive Machines Inc. ) and NIO (NIO Inc.) are both stocks. LUNR operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while NIO operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 3 years, LUNR returned 50.12%/yr vs -11.00%/yr for NIO. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LUNR vs. NIO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LUNR achieves a 83.21% return, which is significantly higher than NIO's 6.86% return.
LUNR
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 83.21%
- 6M
- 155.67%
- 1Y
- 153.93%
- 3Y*
- 50.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NIO
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- -6.84%
- YTD
- 6.86%
- 6M
- 6.86%
- 1Y
- 50.14%
- 3Y*
- -11.00%
- 5Y*
- -33.76%
- 10Y*
- —
LUNR vs. NIO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc. | 83.21% | -10.63% | 610.76% | -74.45% | 3.73% | -0.10% |
NIO NIO Inc. | 6.86% | 16.97% | -51.93% | -6.97% | -69.22% | -20.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between LUNR and NIO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2021 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
LUNR:
$4.40T
NIO:
$13.52B
LUNR:
-$0.00
NIO:
-$3.74
LUNR:
3.30K
NIO:
0.13
LUNR:
$334.27M
NIO:
$100.51B
LUNR:
$85.92M
NIO:
$15.77B
LUNR:
-$96.76M
NIO:
-$7.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LUNR vs. NIO — Risk / Return Rank
LUNR
NIO
LUNR vs. NIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) and NIO Inc. (NIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LUNR | NIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.17 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 1.15 | +2.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.75 | 2.06 | +5.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LUNR | NIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 0.80 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | -0.03 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
LUNR vs. NIO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUNR drawdown since its inception was -97.43%, roughly equal to the maximum NIO drawdown of -95.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUNR and NIO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LUNR | NIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.43% | -95.00% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.88% | -43.73% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.54% | -79.69% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -94.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.73% | -91.33% | +27.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.26% | -67.89% | +4.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.93% | 24.47% | -4.54% |
Volatility
LUNR vs. NIO - Volatility Comparison
Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a higher volatility of 44.37% compared to NIO Inc. (NIO) at 19.67%. This indicates that LUNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LUNR | NIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 44.37% | 19.67% | +24.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 90.79% | 40.94% | +49.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 109.27% | 63.03% | +46.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 171.34% | 71.70% | +99.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 171.34% | 86.69% | +84.65% |
Dividends
LUNR vs. NIO - Dividend Comparison
Neither LUNR nor NIO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LUNR vs. NIO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intuitive Machines Inc. and NIO Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LUNR vs. NIO - Profitability Comparison
LUNR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported a gross profit of 72.82M and revenue of 186.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.
NIO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIO Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.86B and revenue of 25.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.0%.
LUNR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported an operating income of -39.20M and revenue of 186.73M, resulting in an operating margin of -21.0%.
NIO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIO Inc. reported an operating income of -308.81M and revenue of 25.53B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.2%.
LUNR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported a net income of -37.55M and revenue of 186.73M, resulting in a net margin of -20.1%.
NIO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIO Inc. reported a net income of -496.01M and revenue of 25.53B, resulting in a net margin of -1.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LUNR and NIO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LUNR has higher volatility (44.37%) compared to NIO (19.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUNR dropped -97.43% vs NIO's -95.00%.
LUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LUNR and NIO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer