LUNR vs. MSFT
LUNR (Intuitive Machines Inc. ) and MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) are both stocks. LUNR operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while MSFT operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 3 years, LUNR returned 42.24%/yr vs 6.16%/yr for MSFT. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LUNR vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LUNR achieves a 64.02% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -18.85% return.
LUNR
- 1D
- -13.12%
- 1M
- -25.39%
- YTD
- 64.02%
- 6M
- 122.39%
- 1Y
- 144.44%
- 3Y*
- 42.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFT
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- -18.85%
- 6M
- -17.98%
- 1Y
- -17.75%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- 24.39%
LUNR vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc. | 64.02% | -10.63% | 610.76% | -74.45% | 3.73% | -0.10% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -18.85% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | -0.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between LUNR and MSFT is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
LUNR:
$3.94T
MSFT:
$2.91T
LUNR:
-$0.00
MSFT:
$16.79
LUNR:
2.95K
MSFT:
9.16
LUNR:
$334.27M
MSFT:
$318.27B
LUNR:
$85.92M
MSFT:
$217.41B
LUNR:
-$96.76M
MSFT:
$200.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LUNR vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
LUNR
MSFT
LUNR vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LUNR | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.89 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | -0.53 | +3.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.12 | -1.08 | +8.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LUNR vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUNR drawdown since its inception was -97.43%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUNR and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LUNR | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.43% | -69.38% | -28.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.94% | -33.91% | -8.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.54% | -33.91% | -44.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.53% | -27.46% | -40.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -21.78% | -41.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.37% | 16.48% | +3.89% |
Volatility
LUNR vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a higher volatility of 42.95% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 10.52%. This indicates that LUNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LUNR | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 42.95% | 10.52% | +32.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 93.42% | 22.31% | +71.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 111.16% | 25.42% | +85.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 171.29% | 26.66% | +144.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 171.29% | 27.06% | +144.23% |
Dividends
LUNR vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
LUNR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.91% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Financials
LUNR vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intuitive Machines Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LUNR vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison
LUNR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported a gross profit of 72.82M and revenue of 186.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.
MSFT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.
LUNR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported an operating income of -39.20M and revenue of 186.73M, resulting in an operating margin of -21.0%.
MSFT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.
LUNR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported a net income of -37.55M and revenue of 186.73M, resulting in a net margin of -20.1%.
MSFT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LUNR and MSFT have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LUNR has higher volatility (42.95%) compared to MSFT (10.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUNR dropped -97.43% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
LUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LUNR and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer