PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUNR vs. MO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LUNR vs. MO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) and Altria Group, Inc. (MO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUNR achieves a 83.21% return, which is significantly higher than MO's 25.71% return.


LUNR

1D
1.28%
1M
2.64%
YTD
83.21%
6M
155.67%
1Y
153.93%
3Y*
50.12%
5Y*
10Y*

MO

1D
-1.25%
1M
4.65%
YTD
25.71%
6M
27.02%
1Y
28.81%
3Y*
25.85%
5Y*
16.08%
10Y*
7.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUNR vs. MO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LUNR
Intuitive Machines Inc.
83.21%-10.63%610.76%-74.45%3.73%-0.10%
MO
Altria Group, Inc.
25.71%18.17%40.76%-3.70%4.37%8.73%

Correlation

The correlation between LUNR and MO is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2021

-0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LUNR:

$4.40T

MO:

$119.27B

EPS

LUNR:

-$0.00

MO:

$4.79

PS Ratio

LUNR:

3.30K

MO:

5.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

LUNR:

$334.27M

MO:

$21.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LUNR:

$85.92M

MO:

$14.80B

EBITDA (TTM)

LUNR:

-$96.76M

MO:

$11.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LUNR vs. MO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUNR
LUNR Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
LUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
LUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

MO
MO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
MO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
MO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
MO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
MO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUNR vs. MO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) and Altria Group, Inc. (MO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LUNRMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.25

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

1.76

+1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.75

4.45

+3.30

LUNR vs. MO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUNR Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the MO Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUNR and MO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LUNRMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

1.29

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.69

-0.53

Drawdowns

LUNR vs. MO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUNR drawdown since its inception was -97.43%, which is greater than MO's maximum drawdown of -65.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUNR and MO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LUNRMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.43%

-65.43%

-32.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.88%

-16.40%

-25.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.54%

-16.40%

-62.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.73%

-4.37%

-59.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.26%

-11.93%

-51.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.93%

6.49%

+13.44%

Volatility

LUNR vs. MO - Volatility Comparison

Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a higher volatility of 44.37% compared to Altria Group, Inc. (MO) at 6.69%. This indicates that LUNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LUNRMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

44.37%

6.69%

+37.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

90.79%

17.32%

+73.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

109.27%

22.53%

+86.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

171.34%

20.64%

+150.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

171.34%

22.96%

+148.38%

Dividends

LUNR vs. MO - Dividend Comparison

LUNR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LUNR
Intuitive Machines Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MO
Altria Group, Inc.
5.89%7.21%7.65%9.52%8.05%7.43%8.29%6.57%6.07%3.56%3.48%3.73%

Financials

LUNR vs. MO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intuitive Machines Inc. and Altria Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
186.73M
5.43B
(LUNR) Total Revenue
(MO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LUNR vs. MO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Intuitive Machines Inc. and Altria Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
39.0%
64.6%
Portfolio components
LUNR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported a gross profit of 72.82M and revenue of 186.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.

MO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.51B and revenue of 5.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.6%.

LUNR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported an operating income of -39.20M and revenue of 186.73M, resulting in an operating margin of -21.0%.

MO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.96B and revenue of 5.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 54.5%.

LUNR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported a net income of -37.55M and revenue of 186.73M, resulting in a net margin of -20.1%.

MO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 5.43B, resulting in a net margin of 40.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LUNR and MO have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LUNR has higher volatility (44.37%) compared to MO (6.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUNR dropped -97.43% vs MO's -65.43%.

LUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LUNR and MO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer