PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUK2.L vs. LGJP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LUK2.L vs. LGJP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G FTSE 100 Leveraged (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF (LUK2.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LUK2.L is traded in GBp, while LGJP.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LGJP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUK2.L achieves a 10.52% return, which is significantly lower than LGJP.L's 15.40% return.


LUK2.L

1D
-0.45%
1M
0.70%
6M
5.28%
YTD
10.52%
1Y
34.49%
3Y*
23.66%
5Y*
16.82%
10Y*
10.28%

LGJP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.59%
6M
9.38%
YTD
15.40%
1Y
33.41%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUK2.L vs. LGJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LUK2.L
L&G FTSE 100 Leveraged (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF
10.52%43.73%9.81%6.59%3.75%34.76%-30.43%32.52%-11.02%
LGJP.L
L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF
15.40%16.72%10.25%14.24%-6.86%2.01%13.16%14.08%-5.47%

Correlation

The correlation between LUK2.L and LGJP.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018

0.53

The correlation between LUK2.L and LGJP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

LUK2.L vs. LGJP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUK2.L
LUK2.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LUK2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUK2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUK2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
LUK2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUK2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

LGJP.L
LGJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
LGJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
LGJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUK2.L vs. LGJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G FTSE 100 Leveraged (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF (LUK2.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LUK2.LLGJP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.31

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

3.08

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.39

9.53

-4.14

LUK2.L vs. LGJP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUK2.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the LGJP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUK2.L and LGJP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LUK2.L vs. LGJP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUK2.L drawdown since its inception was -58.84%, which is greater than LGJP.L's maximum drawdown of -23.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUK2.L and LGJP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LUK2.LLGJP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.84%

-23.10%

-35.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.55%

-10.76%

-7.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.42%

-13.79%

-11.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.42%

-18.15%

-7.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.09%

-4.57%

-3.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.68%

-4.98%

-5.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.34%

3.49%

+2.85%

Volatility

LUK2.L vs. LGJP.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G FTSE 100 Leveraged (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF (LUK2.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJP.L) have volatilities of 6.11% and 6.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LUK2.LLGJP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

6.43%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.64%

16.88%

+2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.61%

19.99%

+2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.61%

16.80%

+8.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.65%

17.43%

+12.22%

LUK2.L vs. LGJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LUK2.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LGJP.L's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

LUK2.L vs. LGJP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LUK2.L nor LGJP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LUK2.L and LGJP.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGJP.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGJP.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for LUK2.L.

LUK2.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while LGJP.L is Japan Equities. LUK2.L tracks L&G FTSE 100 Leveraged (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF, while LGJP.L tracks L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for LUK2.L and 0.10% for LGJP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LUK2.L and LGJP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer