LUK2.L vs. 2BRE.L
LUK2.L (L&G FTSE 100 Leveraged (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF GBP (Acc)) and 2BRE.L (Leverage Shares 2x Long Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) ETC EUR) are both Leveraged Equities funds. LUK2.L is passively managed, while 2BRE.L is actively managed. Over the past year, LUK2.L returned 36.06% vs -3.20% for 2BRE.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LUK2.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 2BRE.L.
Performance
LUK2.L vs. 2BRE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LUK2.L is traded in GBp, while 2BRE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 2BRE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LUK2.L achieves a 12.85% return, which is significantly higher than 2BRE.L's -11.03% return.
LUK2.L
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 1.34%
- 6M
- 6.53%
- YTD
- 12.85%
- 1Y
- 36.06%
- 3Y*
- 24.04%
- 5Y*
- 17.31%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
2BRE.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.90%
- 6M
- -7.83%
- YTD
- -11.03%
- 1Y
- -3.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LUK2.L vs. 2BRE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LUK2.L L&G FTSE 100 Leveraged (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) | 12.85% | 43.73% | 3.58% |
2BRE.L Leverage Shares 2x Long Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) ETC EUR | -11.03% | 0.18% | 9.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between LUK2.L and 2BRE.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2024 | 0.29 |
The correlation between LUK2.L and 2BRE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LUK2.L vs. 2BRE.L — Risk / Return Rank
LUK2.L
2BRE.L
LUK2.L vs. 2BRE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G FTSE 100 Leveraged (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (LUK2.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Long Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) ETC EUR (2BRE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LUK2.L | 2BRE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.01 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | -0.14 | +2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.67 | -0.26 | +5.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LUK2.L vs. 2BRE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUK2.L drawdown since its inception was -58.84%, which is greater than 2BRE.L's maximum drawdown of -37.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUK2.L and 2BRE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LUK2.L | 2BRE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.84% | -37.53% | -21.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.55% | -23.79% | +5.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.16% | -32.24% | +26.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.67% | -17.55% | +6.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.34% | 12.32% | -5.98% |
Volatility
LUK2.L vs. 2BRE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G FTSE 100 Leveraged (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (LUK2.L) is 5.83%, while Leverage Shares 2x Long Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) ETC EUR (2BRE.L) has a volatility of 6.95%. This indicates that LUK2.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2BRE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LUK2.L | 2BRE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.83% | 6.95% | -1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.66% | 21.81% | -2.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.62% | 29.22% | -6.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.60% | 34.48% | -8.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.65% | 34.48% | -4.83% |
LUK2.L vs. 2BRE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LUK2.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than 2BRE.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LUK2.L vs. 2BRE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LUK2.L nor 2BRE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LUK2.L and 2BRE.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LUK2.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LUK2.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 2BRE.L.
They also come from different issuers: L&G and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for LUK2.L and 0.75% for 2BRE.L.
Find the right allocation for LUK2.L and 2BRE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer