LTVL.DE vs. NESP.L
LTVL.DE (Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Travel & Leisure UCITS ETF Acc) and NESP.L (Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - LTVL.DE is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600 Travel & Leisure, while NESP.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LTVL.DE returned -4.81%/yr vs 25.46%/yr for NESP.L. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LTVL.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for NESP.L.
Performance
LTVL.DE vs. NESP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LTVL.DE is traded in EUR, while NESP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the NESP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTVL.DE achieves a -8.21% return, which is significantly lower than NESP.L's 21.65% return.
LTVL.DE
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- YTD
- -8.21%
- 6M
- -7.98%
- 1Y
- -4.33%
- 3Y*
- -4.81%
- 5Y*
- -4.06%
- 10Y*
- -0.25%
NESP.L
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 10.58%
- YTD
- 21.65%
- 6M
- 20.61%
- 1Y
- 40.36%
- 3Y*
- 25.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LTVL.DE vs. NESP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTVL.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Travel & Leisure UCITS ETF Acc | -8.21% | 1.60% | -4.23% | 22.42% | -13.28% | -13.06% |
NESP.L Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc | 21.67% | 6.89% | 34.87% | 51.27% | -29.08% | 9.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between LTVL.DE and NESP.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021 | 0.43 |
The correlation between LTVL.DE and NESP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LTVL.DE vs. NESP.L — Risk / Return Rank
LTVL.DE
NESP.L
LTVL.DE vs. NESP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Travel & Leisure UCITS ETF Acc (LTVL.DE) and Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (NESP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LTVL.DE | NESP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.43 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 3.64 | -3.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.66 | 10.58 | -11.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LTVL.DE | NESP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 | 2.51 | -2.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.57 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
LTVL.DE vs. NESP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTVL.DE drawdown since its inception was -65.37%, which is greater than NESP.L's maximum drawdown of -29.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTVL.DE and NESP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTVL.DE | NESP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.37% | -29.94% | -35.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.90% | -11.03% | -7.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.32% | -26.45% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.30% | -0.70% | -22.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.35% | -10.56% | -9.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.63% | 3.80% | +3.83% |
Volatility
LTVL.DE vs. NESP.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Travel & Leisure UCITS ETF Acc (LTVL.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (NESP.L) at 4.09%. This indicates that LTVL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NESP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LTVL.DE | NESP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 4.09% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.86% | 11.29% | +3.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.56% | 16.00% | +2.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.03% | 29.88% | -6.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.44% | 29.88% | -5.44% |
LTVL.DE vs. NESP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTVL.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NESP.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
LTVL.DE vs. NESP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LTVL.DE nor NESP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LTVL.DE and NESP.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NESP.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NESP.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LTVL.DE.
LTVL.DE is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while NESP.L is Nasdaq-100. LTVL.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Travel & Leisure, while NESP.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LTVL.DE and 0.25% for NESP.L.
Find the right allocation for LTVL.DE and NESP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer