PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTUSX vs. PDMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTUSX vs. PDMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund (LTUSX) and PIMCO GNMA and Government Securities Fund (PDMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTUSX achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than PDMIX's 1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, LTUSX has underperformed PDMIX with an annualized return of 1.02%, while PDMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.56% annualized return.


LTUSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.45%
1Y
4.63%
3Y*
3.65%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*
1.02%

PDMIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.23%
6M
1.21%
1Y
7.10%
3Y*
4.86%
5Y*
0.32%
10Y*
1.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTUSX vs. PDMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTUSX
Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund
0.47%6.40%2.40%3.40%-8.06%-1.82%3.77%3.61%0.98%0.60%
PDMIX
PIMCO GNMA and Government Securities Fund
1.23%8.43%1.59%6.03%-13.96%-0.65%5.78%6.57%0.83%2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between LTUSX and PDMIX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 1997

0.79

The correlation between LTUSX and PDMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTUSX vs. PDMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTUSX
LTUSX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
LTUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
LTUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

PDMIX
PDMIX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
PDMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PDMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTUSX vs. PDMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund (LTUSX) and PIMCO GNMA and Government Securities Fund (PDMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LTUSXPDMIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.53

1.61

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.28

2.43

-0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.30

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

2.21

-0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.84

7.55

-1.71

LTUSX vs. PDMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTUSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the PDMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTUSX and PDMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTUSXPDMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

1.61

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.05

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.31

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

1.03

+0.11

Drawdowns

LTUSX vs. PDMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTUSX drawdown since its inception was -12.34%, smaller than the maximum PDMIX drawdown of -18.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTUSX and PDMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTUSXPDMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.34%

-18.64%

+6.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.31%

-3.24%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.69%

-7.13%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.69%

-18.59%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.34%

-18.64%

+6.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-1.34%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.40%

-1.75%

+0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

0.94%

-0.18%

Volatility

LTUSX vs. PDMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund (LTUSX) is 0.95%, while PIMCO GNMA and Government Securities Fund (PDMIX) has a volatility of 1.76%. This indicates that LTUSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTUSXPDMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

1.76%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.04%

3.27%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93%

4.46%

-1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.02%

6.66%

-2.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.08%

5.06%

-1.98%

LTUSX vs. PDMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTUSX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than PDMIX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

LTUSX vs. PDMIX - Dividend Comparison

LTUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than PDMIX's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTUSX
Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund
2.63%2.69%2.62%1.89%1.63%1.21%1.35%1.77%1.90%1.45%2.52%1.50%
PDMIX
PIMCO GNMA and Government Securities Fund
4.30%4.29%4.66%3.76%3.84%2.03%2.40%3.41%3.10%2.96%2.93%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


LTUSX and PDMIX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDMIX has higher volatility (1.76%) compared to LTUSX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTUSX dropped -12.34% vs PDMIX's -18.64%.

PDMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTUSX and PDMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer