LTUSX vs. FVIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund (LTUSX) and Fidelity Advisor Government Income Fund Class A (FVIAX).
LTUSX is managed by Thornburg. It was launched on Nov 15, 1987. FVIAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 24, 2006.
Performance
LTUSX vs. FVIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LTUSX vs. FVIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTUSX Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund | 0.37% | 6.40% | 2.40% | 3.40% | -8.06% | -1.82% | 3.77% | 3.61% | 0.98% | 0.60% |
FVIAX Fidelity Advisor Government Income Fund Class A | -0.19% | 6.20% | -0.18% | 3.64% | -13.30% | -2.54% | 6.45% | 6.06% | 0.39% | 1.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTUSX achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly higher than FVIAX's -0.19% return. Over the past 10 years, LTUSX has outperformed FVIAX with an annualized return of 1.03%, while FVIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.48% annualized return.
LTUSX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- 0.75%
- 10Y*
- 1.03%
FVIAX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- -0.19%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 3.08%
- 3Y*
- 2.11%
- 5Y*
- -0.79%
- 10Y*
- 0.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LTUSX vs. FVIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTUSX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than FVIAX's 0.77% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LTUSX vs. FVIAX — Risk / Return Rank
LTUSX
FVIAX
LTUSX vs. FVIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund (LTUSX) and Fidelity Advisor Government Income Fund Class A (FVIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LTUSX | FVIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | 0.83 | +0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.00 | 1.20 | +0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.14 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 1.43 | +1.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.64 | 3.84 | +3.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LTUSX | FVIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 0.83 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | -0.13 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.10 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 0.22 | +0.93 |
Correlation
The correlation between LTUSX and FVIAX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LTUSX vs. FVIAX - Dividend Comparison
LTUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than FVIAX's 2.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTUSX Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund | 2.32% | 2.69% | 2.62% | 1.89% | 1.63% | 1.21% | 1.35% | 1.77% | 1.90% | 1.45% | 2.52% | 1.50% |
FVIAX Fidelity Advisor Government Income Fund Class A | 2.82% | 3.03% | 2.93% | 2.03% | 0.86% | 0.39% | 2.07% | 1.77% | 1.75% | 1.47% | 2.34% | 1.96% |
Drawdowns
LTUSX vs. FVIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTUSX drawdown since its inception was -12.34%, smaller than the maximum FVIAX drawdown of -20.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTUSX and FVIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTUSX | FVIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.34% | -20.79% | +8.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.00% | -2.88% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.69% | -18.57% | +6.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.34% | -20.66% | +8.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -8.86% | +7.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.40% | -7.06% | +5.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.65% | 1.07% | -0.42% |
Volatility
LTUSX vs. FVIAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund (LTUSX) is 1.24%, while Fidelity Advisor Government Income Fund Class A (FVIAX) has a volatility of 1.55%. This indicates that LTUSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FVIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LTUSX | FVIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.24% | 1.55% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.99% | 2.58% | -0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.29% | 4.31% | -1.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.99% | 6.09% | -2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.06% | 5.04% | -1.98% |