LTUG.DE vs. LYMS.DE
LTUG.DE (Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Acc) and LYMS.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - LTUG.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600 Technology, while LYMS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LTUG.DE returned 13.07%/yr vs 21.41%/yr for LYMS.DE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LTUG.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for LYMS.DE.
Performance
LTUG.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTUG.DE achieves a 26.55% return, which is significantly higher than LYMS.DE's 20.63% return. Over the past 10 years, LTUG.DE has underperformed LYMS.DE with an annualized return of 13.07%, while LYMS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 21.41% annualized return.
LTUG.DE
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 15.64%
- YTD
- 26.55%
- 6M
- 25.15%
- 1Y
- 25.48%
- 3Y*
- 14.34%
- 5Y*
- 9.07%
- 10Y*
- 13.07%
LYMS.DE
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 9.25%
- YTD
- 20.63%
- 6M
- 19.42%
- 1Y
- 37.94%
- 3Y*
- 24.71%
- 5Y*
- 18.88%
- 10Y*
- 21.41%
LTUG.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTUG.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Acc | 26.55% | 4.10% | 6.60% | 30.68% | -26.76% | 34.20% | 14.21% | 40.78% | -11.90% | 20.57% |
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc | 20.63% | 7.15% | 33.72% | 51.52% | -29.87% | 39.59% | 34.60% | 42.84% | 3.18% | 15.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between LTUG.DE and LYMS.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2007 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, LTUG.DE and LYMS.DE have become more correlated (0.69) than their long-term average of 0.47, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LTUG.DE vs. LYMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LTUG.DE
LYMS.DE
LTUG.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Acc (LTUG.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LTUG.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.42 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 3.77 | -2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.42 | 11.23 | -6.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LTUG.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 2.40 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.94 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 1.08 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.77 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
LTUG.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTUG.DE drawdown since its inception was -61.39%, which is greater than LYMS.DE's maximum drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTUG.DE and LYMS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTUG.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.39% | -50.00% | -11.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.90% | -10.02% | -4.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.99% | -26.74% | +2.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.21% | -31.12% | -9.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.21% | -31.12% | -9.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.86% | +0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.85% | -8.78% | -6.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.75% | 3.37% | +2.38% |
Volatility
LTUG.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Acc (LTUG.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.18% compared to Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) at 4.37%. This indicates that LTUG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LTUG.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.18% | 4.37% | +3.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.11% | 10.99% | +8.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.19% | 15.73% | +7.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.16% | 19.91% | +5.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.26% | 19.68% | +5.58% |
LTUG.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTUG.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than LYMS.DE's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
LTUG.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LTUG.DE nor LYMS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTUG.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.65% | 0.69% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LTUG.DE and LYMS.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYMS.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYMS.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LTUG.DE.
LTUG.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while LYMS.DE is Nasdaq-100. LTUG.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Technology, while LYMS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LTUG.DE and 0.22% for LYMS.DE.
Find the right allocation for LTUG.DE and LYMS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer