LTTI vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LTTI (FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LTTI returned 4.48% vs 11.44% for OMAH. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LTTI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

LTTI vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTTI achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than OMAH's 4.56% return.

LTTI

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: -1.05%
• 6M: -2.14%
• 1Y: 4.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 4.56%
• 6M: 4.00%
• 1Y: 11.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTTI vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LTTI FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF	-1.05%	0.13%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	4.56%	6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between LTTI and OMAH is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025	0.11

Return for Risk

LTTI vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTTI

LTTI Risk / Return Rank: 17
LTTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
LTTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
LTTI Omega Ratio Rank: 16
LTTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
LTTI Martin Ratio Rank: 17

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 49
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 37
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTTI vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LTTI	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	1.43	-0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	2.02	-1.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.25	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.64	3.82	-3.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.57	9.48	-7.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LTTI vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the OMAH Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTTI and OMAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LTTI	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50	1.43	-0.92
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.70	-0.61

Drawdowns

LTTI vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTTI drawdown since its inception was -9.02%, smaller than the maximum OMAH drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTTI and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTTI	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.02%	-11.83%	+2.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.08%	-3.00%	-4.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.69%	-2.65%	-2.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.65%	-1.26%	-2.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.86%	1.21%	+1.65%

Volatility

LTTI vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI) has a higher volatility of 2.56% compared to VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) at 1.93%. This indicates that LTTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTTI	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.56%	1.93%	+0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.06%	5.49%	+0.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.92%	8.05%	+0.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.28%	13.21%	-2.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.28%	13.21%	-2.93%

LTTI vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTTI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

LTTI vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

LTTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.21%, less than OMAH's 15.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
LTTI FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF	9.21%	7.08%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.44%	12.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTTI and OMAH in my portfolio?

LTTI and OMAH have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LTTI or OMAH?

LTTI has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to OMAH (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTTI dropped -9.02% vs OMAH's -11.83%.

Which ETF is better, LTTI or OMAH?

On 1-year performance, OMAH leads with 11.44% vs 4.48% for LTTI. On fees, LTTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LTTI or OMAH?

Over the 1-year period, OMAH has performed better with a 11.44% return vs 4.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LTTI or OMAH?

LTTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LTTI or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.44%, compared with 9.21% for LTTI.

What is the main difference between LTTI and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LTTI and 0.95% for OMAH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OMAH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.