LTTI vs. GOOY
LTTI (FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF) and GOOY (YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LTTI returned -2.61% vs 64.48% for GOOY. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LTTI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GOOY.
Performance
LTTI vs. GOOY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTTI achieves a -4.10% return, which is significantly lower than GOOY's 11.24% return.
LTTI
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- 6M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- -4.10%
- 1Y
- -2.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -1.21%
GOOY
- 1D
- 5.28%
- 1M
- -1.93%
- 6M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 11.24%
- 1Y
- 64.48%
- 3Y*
- 23.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.98%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.95M | $4.53M | $7.81M | |
| $120.18K | $116.89K | $129.92K |
LTTI vs. GOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LTTI FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF | -4.10% | 2.43% |
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF | 11.24% | 56.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between LTTI and GOOY is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LTTI vs. GOOY — Risk / Return Rank
LTTI
GOOY
LTTI vs. GOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LTTI | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.43 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 3.53 | -3.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.39 | 10.51 | -10.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LTTI vs. GOOY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTTI drawdown since its inception was -9.02%, smaller than the maximum GOOY drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTTI and GOOY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTTI | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.02% | -24.40% | +15.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.63% | -17.70% | +10.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.63% | -10.52% | +2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.78% | -6.46% | +2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 5.94% | -2.50% |
Volatility
LTTI vs. GOOY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI) is 2.24%, while YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) has a volatility of 10.30%. This indicates that LTTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LTTI | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.24% | 10.30% | -8.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.27% | 20.43% | -14.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.45% | 25.69% | -17.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.05% | 23.89% | -13.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.05% | 23.89% | -13.84% |
LTTI vs. GOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTTI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
LTTI vs. GOOY - Dividend Comparison
LTTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.55%, less than GOOY's 55.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF | 55.09% | 41.50% | 36.74% | 7.90% |
LTTI FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF | 8.74% | 7.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LTTI and GOOY have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOOY has higher volatility (10.30%) compared to LTTI (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTTI dropped -9.02% vs GOOY's -24.40%.
On 1-year performance, GOOY leads with 64.48% vs -2.61% for LTTI. On fees, LTTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, LTTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GOOY has performed better with a 64.48% return vs -2.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LTTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOY.
GOOY has the higher dividend yield at 55.09%, compared with 8.74% for LTTI.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LTTI and 0.99% for GOOY.
GOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LTTI and GOOY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer