PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTTI vs. GOOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTTI vs. GOOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTTI achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than GOOY's 13.61% return.


LTTI

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.28%
YTD
-1.05%
6M
-2.14%
1Y
4.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOOY

1D
-0.65%
1M
-5.16%
YTD
13.61%
6M
11.36%
1Y
88.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTTI vs. GOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LTTI and GOOY is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTTI vs. GOOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTTI
LTTI Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
LTTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTTI Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
LTTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTTI Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOY
GOOY Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTTI vs. GOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LTTIGOOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.65

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

5.50

-4.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.57

21.08

-19.51

LTTI vs. GOOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the GOOY Sharpe Ratio of 3.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTTI and GOOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTTIGOOYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

3.84

-3.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

1.09

-1.00

Drawdowns

LTTI vs. GOOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTTI drawdown since its inception was -9.02%, smaller than the maximum GOOY drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTTI and GOOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTTIGOOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.02%

-24.40%

+15.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-16.15%

+9.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.69%

-8.61%

+3.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.65%

-6.26%

+2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

4.20%

-1.34%

Volatility

LTTI vs. GOOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI) is 2.56%, while YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) has a volatility of 6.90%. This indicates that LTTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTTIGOOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

6.90%

-4.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.06%

17.19%

-11.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.92%

23.19%

-14.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.28%

23.31%

-13.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.28%

23.31%

-13.03%

LTTI vs. GOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTTI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

LTTI vs. GOOY - Dividend Comparison

LTTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.21%, less than GOOY's 50.99% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GOOY
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF
50.99%41.50%36.74%7.90%
LTTI
FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF
9.21%7.08%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LTTI and GOOY have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOOY has higher volatility (6.90%) compared to LTTI (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTTI dropped -9.02% vs GOOY's -24.40%.

On 1-year performance, GOOY leads with 88.26% vs 4.48% for LTTI. On fees, LTTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, LTTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOY has performed better with a 88.26% return vs 4.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LTTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOY.

GOOY has the higher dividend yield at 50.99%, compared with 9.21% for LTTI.

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LTTI and 0.99% for GOOY.

GOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTTI and GOOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer