PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTTI vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTTI vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTTI achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.


LTTI

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.28%
YTD
-1.05%
6M
-2.14%
1Y
4.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DBO

1D
2.27%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
84.75%
6M
81.10%
1Y
80.26%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTTI vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
LTTI
FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF
-1.05%2.30%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
84.75%-12.32%

Correlation

The correlation between LTTI and DBO is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025

-0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTTI vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTTI
LTTI Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
LTTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTTI Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
LTTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTTI Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTTI vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LTTIDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.38

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

4.44

-3.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.57

9.02

-7.45

LTTI vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTTI and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTTIDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

2.34

-1.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.02

+0.07

Drawdowns

LTTI vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTTI drawdown since its inception was -9.02%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTTI and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTTIDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.02%

-90.18%

+81.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-18.19%

+11.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.69%

-51.38%

+46.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.65%

-62.25%

+58.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

8.92%

-6.06%

Volatility

LTTI vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI) is 2.56%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that LTTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTTIDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

12.61%

-10.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.06%

28.20%

-22.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.92%

34.46%

-25.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.28%

32.29%

-22.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.28%

31.78%

-21.50%

LTTI vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTTI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

LTTI vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

LTTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.21%, more than DBO's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.90%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
LTTI
FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF
9.21%7.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LTTI and DBO have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to LTTI (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTTI dropped -9.02% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 1-year performance, DBO leads with 80.26% vs 4.48% for LTTI. On fees, LTTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, LTTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DBO has performed better with a 80.26% return vs 4.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LTTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

LTTI has the higher dividend yield at 9.21%, compared with 1.90% for DBO.

LTTI is categorized as Derivative Income, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LTTI and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTTI and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer