LTTI vs. ARMW
LTTI (FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LTTI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.
Performance
LTTI vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTTI achieves a -4.10% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 134.95% return.
LTTI
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- 6M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- -4.10%
- 1Y
- -2.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -1.21%
ARMW
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -28.55%
- 6M
- 146.99%
- YTD
- 134.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.87M | $4.86M | $4.12M | |
| $120.18K | $116.89K | $129.92K |
LTTI vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LTTI FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF | -4.10% | -3.39% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 134.95% | -41.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between LTTI and ARMW is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LTTI vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank
LTTI
ARMW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LTTI vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LTTI | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.39 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LTTI vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTTI drawdown since its inception was -9.02%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTTI and ARMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTTI | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.02% | -56.50% | +47.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.63% | -52.71% | +45.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.78% | -27.18% | +23.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | — | — |
Volatility
LTTI vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LTTI | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.27% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.45% | 96.03% | -87.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.05% | 96.03% | -85.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.05% | 96.03% | -85.98% |
LTTI vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTTI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
LTTI vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison
LTTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.55%, less than ARMW's 62.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 62.70% | 16.38% |
LTTI FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF | 8.74% | 7.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LTTI and ARMW have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LTTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LTTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.
ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 62.70%, compared with 8.74% for LTTI.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LTTI and 0.99% for ARMW.
Find the right allocation for LTTI and ARMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer