PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTRYX vs. MWIGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTRYX vs. MWIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Total Return Fund (LTRYX) and Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund (MWIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTRYX achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than MWIGX's 0.46% return.


LTRYX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.59%
1Y
5.97%
3Y*
4.51%
5Y*
0.18%
10Y*
1.89%

MWIGX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.46%
6M
0.70%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
5.45%
5Y*
0.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTRYX vs. MWIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LTRYX
Lord Abbett Total Return Fund
0.42%7.52%2.09%6.00%-14.60%0.16%7.66%8.57%0.98%
MWIGX
Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund
0.46%7.99%3.82%6.55%-13.01%-1.13%8.41%11.21%4.27%

Correlation

The correlation between LTRYX and MWIGX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018

0.87

The correlation between LTRYX and MWIGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTRYX vs. MWIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTRYX
LTRYX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
LTRYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTRYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTRYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
LTRYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTRYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

MWIGX
MWIGX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MWIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MWIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTRYX vs. MWIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Total Return Fund (LTRYX) and Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund (MWIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LTRYXMWIGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.44

1.65

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.18

2.59

-0.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.32

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

2.40

-0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.23

8.02

-1.79

LTRYX vs. MWIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTRYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the MWIGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTRYX and MWIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTRYXMWIGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.65

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.16

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.71

+0.10

Drawdowns

LTRYX vs. MWIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTRYX drawdown since its inception was -19.00%, roughly equal to the maximum MWIGX drawdown of -18.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTRYX and MWIGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTRYXMWIGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.00%

-18.32%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.13%

-2.35%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.57%

-3.88%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.00%

-18.32%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-0.81%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.56%

-4.47%

+1.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

0.70%

+0.31%

Volatility

LTRYX vs. MWIGX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Total Return Fund (LTRYX) has a higher volatility of 1.43% compared to Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund (MWIGX) at 1.13%. This indicates that LTRYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MWIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTRYXMWIGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.43%

1.13%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.96%

2.37%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.01%

3.24%

+0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.60%

4.94%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.66%

4.76%

-0.10%

LTRYX vs. MWIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTRYX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than MWIGX's 1.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

LTRYX vs. MWIGX - Dividend Comparison

LTRYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than MWIGX's 4.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTRYX
Lord Abbett Total Return Fund
4.92%4.92%4.16%4.28%2.78%2.92%4.83%3.09%3.56%2.80%3.34%3.31%
MWIGX
Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund
4.05%3.70%4.52%4.97%6.33%4.25%9.21%12.03%3.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, LTRYX and MWIGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LTRYX has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to MWIGX (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTRYX dropped -19.00% vs MWIGX's -18.32%.

MWIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTRYX and MWIGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer