PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTPZ vs. TIPZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTPZ vs. TIPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) and PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF (TIPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTPZ achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than TIPZ's 2.58% return. Over the past 10 years, LTPZ has underperformed TIPZ with an annualized return of 0.75%, while TIPZ has yielded a comparatively higher 2.49% annualized return.


LTPZ

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.02%
YTD
0.41%
6M
-1.15%
1Y
4.72%
3Y*
-0.79%
5Y*
-5.24%
10Y*
0.75%

TIPZ

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
2.58%
6M
1.00%
1Y
5.12%
3Y*
3.86%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*
2.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTPZ vs. TIPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTPZ
PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF
0.41%4.00%-4.80%0.96%-31.71%7.02%24.89%17.47%-7.22%9.07%
TIPZ
PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF
2.58%5.87%1.52%3.37%-12.67%5.48%10.98%8.64%-1.65%3.12%

Correlation

The correlation between LTPZ and TIPZ is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2009

0.88

The correlation between LTPZ and TIPZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTPZ vs. TIPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTPZ
LTPZ Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
LTPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
LTPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

TIPZ
TIPZ Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
TIPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
TIPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTPZ vs. TIPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) and PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF (TIPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LTPZTIPZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.51

1.31

-0.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.78

1.93

-1.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.24

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

2.36

-1.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.48

7.37

-5.89

LTPZ vs. TIPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTPZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the TIPZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTPZ and TIPZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTPZTIPZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

1.31

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

0.12

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

0.43

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.53

-0.31

Drawdowns

LTPZ vs. TIPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTPZ drawdown since its inception was -40.99%, which is greater than TIPZ's maximum drawdown of -15.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTPZ and TIPZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTPZTIPZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.99%

-15.77%

-25.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

-2.18%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.27%

-4.74%

-11.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.99%

-15.77%

-25.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.99%

-15.77%

-25.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.74%

-1.44%

-31.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.41%

-4.33%

-8.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

0.70%

+2.50%

Volatility

LTPZ vs. TIPZ - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) has a higher volatility of 2.32% compared to PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF (TIPZ) at 0.96%. This indicates that LTPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTPZTIPZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.32%

0.96%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.41%

2.88%

+3.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.26%

3.92%

+5.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.89%

6.37%

+9.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.07%

5.84%

+9.23%

LTPZ vs. TIPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LTPZ and TIPZ have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LTPZ vs. TIPZ - Dividend Comparison

LTPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, more than TIPZ's 5.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTPZ
PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF
5.23%4.64%3.71%3.71%8.38%3.56%1.42%1.74%3.05%2.25%2.32%0.71%
TIPZ
PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF
5.11%4.74%4.44%4.69%7.14%4.41%1.47%1.65%2.23%1.70%1.06%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


LTPZ and TIPZ have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LTPZ has higher volatility (2.32%) compared to TIPZ (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTPZ dropped -40.99% vs TIPZ's -15.77%.

On 10-year performance, TIPZ leads with 2.49% vs 0.75% for LTPZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, TIPZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TIPZ has performed better with a 2.49% return vs 0.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LTPZ and TIPZ have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

LTPZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.23%, compared with 5.11% for TIPZ.

LTPZ tracks ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y), while TIPZ tracks ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury.

TIPZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTPZ and TIPZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer