PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTNYX vs. LSMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTNYX vs. LSMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Rochester Limited Term New York Municipal Fund (LTNYX) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTNYX achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than LSMSX's 1.12% return.


LTNYX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.42%
6M
-0.56%
YTD
0.15%
1Y
2.89%
3Y*
3.10%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*
2.15%
ALL TIME*
3.58%

LSMSX

1D
-0.21%
1M
-1.78%
6M
0.26%
YTD
1.12%
1Y
6.64%
3Y*
3.47%
5Y*
0.70%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LTNYX vs. LSMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTNYX
Invesco Rochester Limited Term New York Municipal Fund
0.15%4.23%3.40%3.70%-7.40%2.67%3.32%7.28%10.39%-4.09%
LSMSX
Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund
1.12%3.22%2.22%7.96%-10.03%4.11%4.48%8.16%0.46%4.92%

Correlation

The correlation between LTNYX and LSMSX is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.50

The correlation between LTNYX and LSMSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTNYX vs. LSMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LTNYX
LTNYX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
LTNYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTNYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTNYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
LTNYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTNYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

LSMSX
LSMSX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
LSMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
LSMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LTNYX vs. LSMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Rochester Limited Term New York Municipal Fund (LTNYX) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LTNYXLSMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.63

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.65

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.56

8.88

-1.32

LTNYX vs. LSMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTNYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the LSMSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTNYX and LSMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LTNYX vs. LSMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTNYX drawdown since its inception was -13.78%, smaller than the maximum LSMSX drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTNYX and LSMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTNYXLSMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.78%

-15.00%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.77%

-2.82%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.36%

-7.49%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.76%

-14.92%

+4.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-1.78%

+0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.43%

-2.81%

+1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.51%

0.84%

-0.33%

Volatility

LTNYX vs. LSMSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Rochester Limited Term New York Municipal Fund (LTNYX) is 0.84%, while Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX) has a volatility of 1.01%. This indicates that LTNYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTNYXLSMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

1.01%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.23%

2.28%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82%

2.89%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.49%

4.51%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.57%

4.48%

-0.91%

LTNYX vs. LSMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTNYX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than LSMSX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

LTNYX vs. LSMSX - Dividend Comparison

LTNYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than LSMSX's 3.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSMSX
Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund
3.94%3.83%4.30%3.37%2.38%2.73%2.33%2.55%2.34%0.90%0.00%0.00%
LTNYX
Invesco Rochester Limited Term New York Municipal Fund
2.14%3.74%3.71%2.54%2.31%2.96%2.89%3.35%3.16%3.24%3.71%3.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


LTNYX and LSMSX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSMSX has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to LTNYX (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTNYX dropped -13.78% vs LSMSX's -15.00%.

LSMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTNYX and LSMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer