LTFIX vs. PCSFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LTFIX (Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund) and PCSFX (Principal Capital Securities Fund) are both mutual funds - LTFIX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Principal, while PCSFX is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund managed by Principal. Over the past 10 years, LTFIX returned 11.59%/yr vs 5.45%/yr for PCSFX. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LTFIX charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for PCSFX.

Performance

LTFIX vs. PCSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX) and Principal Capital Securities Fund (PCSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTFIX achieves a 9.67% return, which is significantly higher than PCSFX's 1.26% return. Over the past 10 years, LTFIX has outperformed PCSFX with an annualized return of 11.59%, while PCSFX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.45% annualized return.

LTFIX

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 4.75%
• YTD: 9.67%
• 6M: 10.05%
• 1Y: 22.88%
• 3Y*: 18.84%
• 5Y*: 9.37%
• 10Y*: 11.59%

PCSFX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 1.26%
• 6M: 1.95%
• 1Y: 7.16%
• 3Y*: 10.29%
• 5Y*: 3.55%
• 10Y*: 5.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTFIX vs. PCSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LTFIX Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund	9.67%	17.80%	17.28%	20.33%	-18.84%	17.73%	16.47%	27.27%	-9.03%	22.52%
PCSFX Principal Capital Securities Fund	1.26%	8.96%	12.15%	6.82%	-11.35%	3.74%	7.71%	17.41%	-4.61%	11.57%

Correlation

The correlation between LTFIX and PCSFX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2014	0.32

The correlation between LTFIX and PCSFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LTFIX vs. PCSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTFIX

LTFIX Risk / Return Rank: 49
LTFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
LTFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
LTFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
LTFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
LTFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

PCSFX

PCSFX Risk / Return Rank: 77
PCSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
PCSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
PCSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PCSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
PCSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTFIX vs. PCSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX) and Principal Capital Securities Fund (PCSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LTFIX	PCSFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	3.44	-1.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	5.10	-2.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.92	-0.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	2.46	+0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.06	11.10	+0.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LTFIX vs. PCSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is lower than the PCSFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTFIX and PCSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LTFIX	PCSFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.97	3.44	-1.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.83	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	1.08	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	1.12	-0.66

Drawdowns

LTFIX vs. PCSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTFIX drawdown since its inception was -52.73%, which is greater than PCSFX's maximum drawdown of -22.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTFIX and PCSFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTFIX	PCSFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.73%	-22.42%	-30.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.71%	-2.97%	-5.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.70%	-2.97%	-12.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.80%	-18.67%	-8.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.50%	-22.42%	-11.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.33%	+0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.64%	-2.48%	-5.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	0.66%	+1.27%

Volatility

LTFIX vs. PCSFX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to Principal Capital Securities Fund (PCSFX) at 0.68%. This indicates that LTFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTFIX	PCSFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.34%	0.68%	+2.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.46%	1.87%	+7.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.84%	2.12%	+9.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.46%	4.28%	+11.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.84%	5.05%	+10.79%

LTFIX vs. PCSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTFIX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is higher than PCSFX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LTFIX vs. PCSFX - Dividend Comparison

LTFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, more than PCSFX's 5.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LTFIX Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund	7.96%	8.73%	8.47%	4.17%	8.60%	5.83%	3.91%	6.03%	6.60%	3.51%	3.99%	4.51%
PCSFX Principal Capital Securities Fund	5.68%	5.80%	5.50%	5.75%	5.68%	4.57%	4.88%	5.43%	6.07%	5.14%	5.08%	5.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTFIX and PCSFX in my portfolio?

LTFIX and PCSFX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LTFIX or PCSFX?

LTFIX has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to PCSFX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTFIX dropped -52.73% vs PCSFX's -22.42%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.