PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTAM.L vs. SGLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTAM.L vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LTAM.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTAM.L achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly higher than SGLN.L's 3.17% return. Over the past 10 years, LTAM.L has underperformed SGLN.L with an annualized return of 8.60%, while SGLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.29% annualized return.


LTAM.L

1D
-2.23%
1M
-5.39%
YTD
11.27%
6M
9.11%
1Y
38.95%
3Y*
11.19%
5Y*
9.88%
10Y*
8.60%

SGLN.L

1D
-1.14%
1M
-2.89%
YTD
3.17%
6M
4.34%
1Y
33.24%
3Y*
27.91%
5Y*
19.95%
10Y*
14.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTAM.L vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTAM.L
iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
11.27%43.14%-25.65%26.15%20.89%-8.55%-14.15%9.44%-0.18%11.17%
SGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
3.17%53.66%28.20%7.24%11.84%-2.57%19.62%14.63%4.36%1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between LTAM.L and SGLN.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2011

0.12

The correlation between LTAM.L and SGLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTAM.L vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTAM.L
LTAM.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
LTAM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTAM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTAM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
LTAM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTAM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

SGLN.L
SGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTAM.L vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LTAM.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LTAM.LSGLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.28

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

1.88

+1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.68

5.03

+5.66

LTAM.L vs. SGLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTAM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the SGLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTAM.L and SGLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTAM.LSGLN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

1.43

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

1.22

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.90

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.55

-0.41

Drawdowns

LTAM.L vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTAM.L drawdown since its inception was -58.47%, which is greater than SGLN.L's maximum drawdown of -41.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTAM.L and SGLN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTAM.LSGLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.47%

-41.71%

-16.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.85%

-17.57%

+6.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.09%

-17.57%

-8.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.09%

-17.57%

-8.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.10%

-21.91%

-26.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.85%

-16.59%

+5.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.19%

-14.76%

-5.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

6.60%

-2.96%

Volatility

LTAM.L vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LTAM.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) have volatilities of 5.31% and 5.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTAM.LSGLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

5.08%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.94%

20.07%

-5.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.68%

23.19%

-5.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.43%

16.29%

+4.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.91%

15.78%

+9.13%

Dividends

LTAM.L vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison

LTAM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, while SGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTAM.L
iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
3.51%3.61%5.69%4.33%6.86%3.17%1.82%2.38%2.11%1.52%1.32%2.89%
SGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LTAM.L and SGLN.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LTAM.L is categorized as Latin America Equities, while SGLN.L is Precious Metals. LTAM.L tracks MSCI EM Latin America NR USD, while SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTAM.L and SGLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer