LTAM.L vs. CMXC.L
LTAM.L (iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and CMXC.L (iShares MSCI Mexico Capped UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Latin America Equities funds from iShares - LTAM.L tracks the MSCI EM Latin America NR USD while CMXC.L tracks the MSCI Mexico Capped Index (Net Return Index). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LTAM.L returned 6.57%/yr vs 6.55%/yr for CMXC.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LTAM.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CMXC.L.
Performance
LTAM.L vs. CMXC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LTAM.L is traded in GBp, while CMXC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CMXC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTAM.L achieves a 13.89% return, which is significantly higher than CMXC.L's 10.42% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LTAM.L having a 6.57% annualized return and CMXC.L not far behind at 6.55%.
LTAM.L
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- 6M
- 7.65%
- YTD
- 13.89%
- 1Y
- 38.81%
- 3Y*
- 11.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- 6.57%
CMXC.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.32%
- 6M
- 4.60%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 1Y
- 32.77%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 13.24%
- 10Y*
- 6.55%
LTAM.L vs. CMXC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTAM.L iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 13.89% | 43.14% | -25.65% | 26.15% | 20.89% | -8.55% | -14.15% | 9.44% | -0.19% | 11.17% |
CMXC.L iShares MSCI Mexico Capped UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.42% | 46.08% | -26.83% | 30.93% | 10.61% | 20.19% | -3.01% | 5.62% | -8.45% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between LTAM.L and CMXC.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2010 | 0.66 |
The correlation between LTAM.L and CMXC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LTAM.L vs. CMXC.L — Risk / Return Rank
LTAM.L
CMXC.L
LTAM.L vs. CMXC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LTAM.L) and iShares MSCI Mexico Capped UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CMXC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LTAM.L | CMXC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.26 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 2.44 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.80 | 8.31 | -0.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LTAM.L vs. CMXC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTAM.L drawdown since its inception was -77.98%, which is greater than CMXC.L's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTAM.L and CMXC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTAM.L | CMXC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.98% | -50.68% | -27.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.73% | -13.15% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.09% | -29.79% | +3.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.09% | -29.79% | +3.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.10% | -50.68% | +2.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.83% | -6.96% | -10.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.01% | -14.43% | -33.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.96% | 3.86% | +1.10% |
Volatility
LTAM.L vs. CMXC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LTAM.L) is 4.77%, while iShares MSCI Mexico Capped UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CMXC.L) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that LTAM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMXC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LTAM.L | CMXC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 5.62% | -0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.89% | 18.36% | -3.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.30% | 21.56% | -3.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.50% | 22.13% | -1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.82% | 25.06% | -0.24% |
LTAM.L vs. CMXC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTAM.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CMXC.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
LTAM.L vs. CMXC.L - Dividend Comparison
LTAM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, while CMXC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMXC.L iShares MSCI Mexico Capped UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LTAM.L iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.44% | 3.61% | 5.69% | 4.33% | 6.86% | 3.17% | 1.82% | 2.38% | 2.10% | 1.52% | 1.32% | 2.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LTAM.L and CMXC.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LTAM.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LTAM.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CMXC.L.
LTAM.L tracks MSCI EM Latin America NR USD, while CMXC.L tracks MSCI Mexico Capped Index (Net Return Index). Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LTAM.L and 0.65% for CMXC.L.
Find the right allocation for LTAM.L and CMXC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer