PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSYAX vs. ICMUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSYAX vs. ICMUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund (LSYAX) and Intrepid Income Fund (ICMUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LSYAX having a 2.47% return and ICMUX slightly lower at 2.43%.


LSYAX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.75%
YTD
2.47%
6M
2.80%
1Y
8.60%
3Y*
8.68%
5Y*
4.57%
10Y*

ICMUX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.81%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.92%
1Y
8.40%
3Y*
9.96%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
5.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSYAX vs. ICMUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LSYAX
Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund
2.47%7.50%8.46%10.60%-7.21%4.50%14.22%
ICMUX
Intrepid Income Fund
2.43%8.16%10.43%10.90%-3.17%10.02%14.38%

Correlation

The correlation between LSYAX and ICMUX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020

0.59

The correlation between LSYAX and ICMUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSYAX vs. ICMUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSYAX
LSYAX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
LSYAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSYAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSYAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
LSYAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSYAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

ICMUX
ICMUX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ICMUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICMUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICMUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ICMUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICMUX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSYAX vs. ICMUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund (LSYAX) and Intrepid Income Fund (ICMUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSYAXICMUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

2.16

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

6.37

-3.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.02

22.42

-7.40

LSYAX vs. ICMUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSYAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is lower than the ICMUX Sharpe Ratio of 4.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSYAX and ICMUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSYAXICMUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

4.44

-1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

2.37

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

2.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.54

2.10

-0.56

Drawdowns

LSYAX vs. ICMUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSYAX drawdown since its inception was -10.79%, which is greater than ICMUX's maximum drawdown of -8.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSYAX and ICMUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSYAXICMUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.79%

-8.77%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.84%

-1.34%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.30%

-3.11%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.79%

-5.64%

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.86%

-0.74%

-1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

0.38%

+0.20%

Volatility

LSYAX vs. ICMUX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund (LSYAX) has a higher volatility of 0.98% compared to Intrepid Income Fund (ICMUX) at 0.58%. This indicates that LSYAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICMUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSYAXICMUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

0.58%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.82%

1.43%

+1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53%

1.93%

+1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.29%

2.66%

+1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.20%

2.58%

+1.62%

LSYAX vs. ICMUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSYAX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ICMUX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSYAX vs. ICMUX - Dividend Comparison

LSYAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.85%, more than ICMUX's 7.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICMUX
Intrepid Income Fund
7.55%7.96%7.85%9.10%8.17%5.99%5.56%3.35%3.07%2.86%3.01%3.53%
LSYAX
Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund
7.85%7.91%8.01%6.38%4.86%5.77%4.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSYAX and ICMUX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSYAX has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to ICMUX (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSYAX dropped -10.79% vs ICMUX's -8.77%.

ICMUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.44 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSYAX and ICMUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer