LSYAX vs. CCLFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund (LSYAX) and Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX).
LSYAX is a passively managed fund by Lord Abbett that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA HY U.S. Corp, Cash Pay, BB-B 1-5 YR USD Index. It was launched on May 1, 2020. CCLFX is managed by Cliffwater. It was launched on Mar 6, 2019.
Performance
LSYAX vs. CCLFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LSYAX vs. CCLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSYAX Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund | -1.19% | 7.50% | 8.46% | 10.60% | -7.21% | 4.50% | 14.22% |
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund | 0.96% | 8.93% | 12.62% | 12.66% | 2.32% | 10.38% | 9.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSYAX achieves a -1.19% return, which is significantly lower than CCLFX's 0.96% return.
LSYAX
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- -1.19%
- 6M
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 5.84%
- 3Y*
- 7.46%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- —
CCLFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 3.09%
- 1Y
- 7.64%
- 3Y*
- 10.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.81%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LSYAX vs. CCLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSYAX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than CCLFX's 3.42% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LSYAX vs. CCLFX — Risk / Return Rank
LSYAX
CCLFX
LSYAX vs. CCLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund (LSYAX) and Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSYAX | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 8.00 | -6.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 16.02 | -14.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 5.88 | -4.54 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 16.71 | -15.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.41 | 101.37 | -94.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSYAX | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 8.00 | -6.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | 5.15 | -4.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | 4.53 | -3.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between LSYAX and CCLFX is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LSYAX vs. CCLFX - Dividend Comparison
LSYAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.38%, less than CCLFX's 10.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSYAX Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund | 7.38% | 7.91% | 8.01% | 6.38% | 4.86% | 5.77% | 4.64% | 0.00% |
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund | 10.37% | 10.47% | 11.27% | 10.96% | 3.96% | 7.03% | 6.90% | 0.61% |
Drawdowns
LSYAX vs. CCLFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSYAX drawdown since its inception was -10.79%, which is greater than CCLFX's maximum drawdown of -3.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSYAX and CCLFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSYAX | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.79% | -3.91% | -6.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.12% | -0.38% | -3.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.79% | -2.25% | -8.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.22% | -0.09% | -2.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.91% | -0.16% | -1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 0.08% | +0.93% |
Volatility
LSYAX vs. CCLFX - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund (LSYAX) has a higher volatility of 1.50% compared to Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) at 0.23%. This indicates that LSYAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LSYAX | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.50% | 0.23% | +1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.49% | 0.65% | +1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.32% | 0.97% | +3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.21% | 1.74% | +2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.18% | 1.89% | +2.29% |